Psychosocial status and quality of life of adolescent girls in Karnataka, India

Authors

  • Veena Rajachar Department of Research, Institute of Health Management Research, Bangalore - 560103, Karnataka, India
  • Manoj Kumar Gupta Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan - 342005, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172458

Keywords:

Adolescent, HEEADSSS, Psychosocial, QOL, WHOQOL-BREF

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted with the objective to assess the psychosocial status and quality of life (QOL) of adolescent girls in Karnataka, India.

Methods: This was a cross sectional community based study which was conducted on 400 adolescent girls each in rural (Bellary district) and urban (Bangalore district) areas of Karnataka, India. WHO’s ‘HEEADSSS’ questionnaire and ‘WHOQOL-BREF’ tool have been used to assess psychosocial status and quality of life of adolescent girls, respectively.

Results: It was observed that nearly 5% girls were at severe and very severe risk of developing psychosocial abnormalities in both rural and urban study area. The mean QOL score was highest for social relations (7102±21.6) and was minimum for physical domain (49.59±12.63).

Conclusions: This calls for urgent community based interventions directed to adolescents and their families having higher vulnerability for psychosocial abnormalities and poor quality of life.

References

World Health Organization (WHO). WHOQOL-BREF: Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment. Programme on mental health. Geneva, WHO. 1996. Available from: http:// www.who.int/ mental_health/media/ en/76.pdf. Accessed on 28th April 2016.

Gupta MK, Mishra CP. A comprehensive scoring system for assessing psychosocial risk status of adolescents girls through ‘HEEADSSS’ approach. Indian J Prev Soc Med. 2011;42(3):241-52.

Budimelli S, Chebrolu K. Psychosocial risk status of rural adolescent girls using ‘HEEADSSS’ approach. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2016;3(6):189-93.

Capoor I, Patel P. Adolescent and Young People's issues and concerns in South Asia: Challenges Ahead. In: Islamabad: The International Conference on Best Practices for Scaling Reproductive Health and Family Planning Programme and Reducing Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. 2006.

Jejeebhoy SJ, Sebastian MP. Actions that protect: promoting sexual and reproductive health choices among young people in India, South and East Asia Regional Working Papers, New Delhi, India: Population Council. 2003:18.

Sodhi G, Verma M, Pelto PJ, Seeking gratification: a study of sexual behaviour patterns of adolescents in an urban slum. In: Koenig MA, Jejeebhoy S, Cleland J and Ganatra B, eds. Reproductive Health in India: New Evidence, Edition 1, Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications; 2008:303-322.

Gupta MK, Mishra CP, Prabha C. Correlates of psychosocial status of rural adolescent girls of Varanasi, India. Int J Curr Res. 2015;7(4):15396-402.

Mitra K, Deb S. Stories of Street Children: Findings from a Field Study. Social Change. 2004;34:77-85.

Paul D, Priscilla S, Siwach S, Gopalakrishanan S, Pant S, Gupta T. Assessments of Psychosocial Morbidities among Adolescents Going to Schools of South-West Delhi. NIPCCD. A Report, 2006.

Awasthi S, Agnihotri K, Chandra H, Singh U, Thakur S. Assessment of health-related quality of life in school-going adolescents: Validation of PedsQL instrument and comparison with WHOQOL-BREF. Nat Med J India. 2012;25(2):74-9.

Qadri S, Ahluwalia SK, Ganai A, Bali S, Wani F, Bashir H. An epidemiological study on quality of life among rural elderly population of northern India. Int J Med Sci Pub Health. 2013;2(3):514-22.

Kook SH, Varni JW. Validation of the Korean version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales in school children and adolescents using the Rasch model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:41.

Reinfjell T, Diseth TH, Veenstra M, Vikan A. Measuring health-related quality of life in young adolescents: Reliability and validity in the Norwegian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:61.

Gkoltsiou K, Dimitrakaki C, Tzavara C, Papaevangelou V, Varni JW, Tountas Y. Measuring health-related quality of life in Greek children: Psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (TM) 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:299-305.

Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life? An analysis of 8,591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:1.

Agnihotri K, Awasthi S, Chandra H, Singh U, Thakur S. Validation of WHO QOLBREF instrument in Indian adolescents. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:381-6.

Wang X, Matsuda N, Ma H, Shinfuku N. Comparative study of quality of life between the Chinese and Japanese adolescent populations. Psychiatr Clin Neurosci. 2000;54:147-52.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-27

How to Cite

Rajachar, V., & Gupta, M. K. (2017). Psychosocial status and quality of life of adolescent girls in Karnataka, India. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(6), 2617–2624. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172458

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles