DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20213942

Role of dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for long anterior urethral strictures

Vedamurthy Reddy Pogula, Ershad Hussain Galeti, Venkatesh Velivela, Bhargava Reddy Kanchi

Abstract


Background: Treatment of the urethral strictures is challenging and with appropriate evaluation preoperatively and surgery planning it is possible to achieve good results. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in treating long anterior urethral strictures.

Methods: Between August 2018 to July 2019 a total of 25 patients with anterior urethral stricture were treated with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Age, etiology of the stricture, stricture length (≤ 7 cm, and > 7 cm), and site of the stricture were assessed as the factors affecting the success rate.

Results: The clinical outcome as Success was defined as the patient not needing any form of urethral instrumentation postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 18 months. Of 25 patients, 22 (92%) were successful and 3 (8%) were a failure. There was no statistically significant difference between the age groups, etiology of the stricture and success rate (p=0.21 and p=0.444). The statistical difference was significant for the site and length of the stricture by means of success (p=0.005 and p=0.025).

Conclusions: Our results show stricture length and localization are the most important variables for good success. Because of less failure rate, single-stage dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty may be offered as an alternative to staged urethroplasty in case of long urethral strictures.  


Keywords


Buccal mucosa, Urethral stricture, Urethroplasty, Buccal mucosa, Graft

Full Text:

PDF

References


MacDonald MF, Santucci RA. Review and treatment algorithm of open surgical techniques for management of urethral strictures. Urol. 2005;65(1):9-15.

Datta B, Rao MP, Acharya RL, Goel N, Saxena V, Trivedi S et al. Dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in long anterior urethral stricture. International Braz J Urol. 2007;33(2):181-7.

Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Rizzo M. Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa in adult bulbourethral strictures. J Urol. 1998;1307-9.

Memmelaar J. Use of Bladder Mucosa in a One-Stage Repair of Hypospadias. J Urol. 1947;58(1):68-73.

Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU International. 2005;95(4):625-9.

Humby G, Higgins TT. A one-stage operation for hypospadias. British Journal of Surgery. 1941;29(113):84-92.

Brannan W, Ochsner MG, Fuselier HA, Goodlet JS. Free Full Thickness Skin Graft Urethroplasty for Urethral Stricture: Experience with 66 Patients. J Urol. 1976;115(6):677-80.

Devine PC, Fallon B, Devine CJ. Free Full Thickness Skin Graft Urethroplasty. J Urol. 1976;116(4):444-6.

Mundy AR, Stephenson TP. Pedicled Preputial Patch Urethroplasty. Brit J Urol. 1988;61(1):48-52.

Orandi A. One-stage urethroplasty1. Brit J Urol. 1968;40(6):717-9.

Morey AF, McAninch JW. Technique of Harvesting Buccal Mucosa for Urethral Reconstruction. The Journal of Urology. 1996;169-7.

Mundy V. Early experience with the use of buccal mucosa for substitution urethroplasty. BJU International. 1998;81(5):738-40.

Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93(9):1191-3.

Iselin CE, Webster GD. Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty for repair of bulbar urethral stricture. J Urol. 1999;815-8.

Barbagli G, Selli C, Tosto A, Palminteri E. Dorsal Free Graft Urethroplasty. J Urol. 1996;123-6.

Caldamone AA, Edstrom LE, Koyle MA, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert WC. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction. Urol. 1998;51(5):15-9.

Metro MJ, Wu H-Y, Snyder HM, Zderic SA, Canning DA. Buccal mucosal grafts. J Urol. 2001;1459-61.

Heinke T, Gerharz EW, Bonfig R, Riedmiller H. Ventral onlay urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for complex stricture repair. Urology. 2003;61(5):1004-7.

Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Gaffi M, Scarpone P, DePaula F, Pizzo M. Buccal mucosa urethroplasty in the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. Urol. 2003;61(5):1008-10.

El-Kassaby AW, El-Zayat TM, Azazy S, Osman T. One-Stage Repair of Long Bulbar Urethral Strictures Using Augmented Russell Dorsal Strip Anastomosis: Outcome of 234 Cases. Eur Urol. 2008;53(2):420-4.

Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M. One-Stage Bulbar Urethroplasty: Retrospective Analysis of the Results in 375 Patients. Eur Urol. 2008;53(4):828-33.

Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Turini D, Lazzeri M. Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique? J Urol. 2005;174(3):955-8.

Barbagli G, Morgia G, Lazzeri M. Retrospective outcome analysis of one-stage penile urethroplasty using a flap or graft in a homogeneous series of patients. BJU International. 2008;102(7):853-60.

Marcha C, Pérez JE, Herrera B, Saez F, Castillo E, Antuña F, et al. Uretroplastia dorsal según técnica de Barbagli: Análisis de resultados y factores de éxito. Archivos Españoles de Urología (Ed impresa). 2010;63(7).

Chen ML, Odom BD, Johnson LJ, Santucci RA. Combining Ventral Buccal Mucosal Graft Onlay and Dorsal Full Thickness Skin Graft Inlay Decreases Failure Rates in Long Bulbar Strictures (≥6 cm). Urol. 2013;81(4):899-903.

Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Dogra PN, Tandon S. Dorsal buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty by a ventral sagittal urethrotomy and minimal-access perineal approach for anterior urethral stricture. BJU International. 2004;93(9):1287-90.

Dubey D, Sehgal A, Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kapoor R, Kumar A. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans related urethral strictures: the outcome of 1 and 2-stage techniques. J Urol. 2005;173(2):463-6.

Duckett JW, Coplen D, Ewalt D, Baskin LS. Buccal Mucosal Urethral Replacement. J Urol. 1995;1660-3.