DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20215030

Profiling cervical ripening for induction of labour with Foley’s balloon catheter in Ebonyi state, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial

Nnabugwu Alfred Adiele, Christian C. Mgbafulu, Arinze Chidiebere Ikeotuonye, Christian Chidebe Anikwe, Joshua Adeniyi Adebayo, Nkemjika Miriam Adiele, Wilson Ndukwe Nwigboji, Ayodele Adegbite Olaleye, Amuchechukwu Veronica Nwafor, Lucky Osaheni Lawani

Abstract


Background: The ripeness of the cervix is an important prerequisite to a successful labour induction. Use of extra-amniotic Foley catheter is a mechanical method of cervical ripening with proven efficacy. This study compared the difference in efficacy between 30 ml and 60 ml of water for inflation of Foley catheter balloon when used for cervical ripening during induction of labour.

Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled study where 260 term pregnant women with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix were selected for induction of labour and randomized into two equal groups (30 ml- and 60 ml- groups) from October, 2019 to July 2020. Each participant had cervical ripening with the catheter bulb inflated with either 30 ml or 60 ml of sterile water (as assigned to the individual). After achieving favourable cervix (BS ≥6), oxytocin titration was commenced and the labour monitored with the outcomes well documented and statistically analysed.

Results: Mean duration to favourable Bishop Score significantly reduced in the 60 ml group (10.8 hours±2.99) as against 12.7 hours±10.0 in 30ml group (p=0.038). Mean duration of active phase of labour was significantly reduced in 60 ml group (5.6 hours±2.4) as against 8.4 hours±3.2 in 30 ml group (p=0.010). Caesarean delivery rate was significantly reduced in the 60 ml groups (p=0.027).

Conclusions: The use of 60 ml inflated Foley’s balloon catheter when compared with 30mls to ripen the cervix effectively reduced the duration to favourable Bishop Score, duration of the active phase of labour and the rate of Caesarean sections.  


Keywords


Cervical ripening, Induction of labour, Foley’s balloon catheter

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carol LA, Ashley SR. Labour and delivery. In: Decherny AH, Nathan L. (eds). Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Obstetrics. 11th Edition. New York: McGraw Hills Medical Publishing Company. 2013;155.

Karjane NW, Ramus RM. Abnormal labour. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/273053- overview. Accessed on 24th July 2017.

Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng Yu, Gienger A, Little SE, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labour. Evidence Report/technology Assessment. 2009;176:1-257.

Vrees RA, Kelly B. Induction of labour. Available at https://emedicine.medscape.com. April 12, 2018. Assessed on 1st February 2019.

Tenore JL. Methods of cervical ripening and induction of labour. Am Fam Physician. 2003;167(10):2133-28.

ACOG committee on practise Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice Bulletin No 107: Induction of labour. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2):386-97.

Ede EE, Umeora OUJ. Induction and Augmentation of labour. In: Umeora OUJ, Eguji CC, Onyebuchi AK, Ezeonu PO. Our teachers: A comprehensive textbook of obstetrics and gynaecology. 1st Ed. St. Benedict printing and Publishing company. 2017;225-9.

Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstorom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first caeserean delivery: Summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National institute of child health and human development society for maternal-fetal medicine and American college of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1181-93.

Goldenberg AE, Smith CV. Cervical ripening. Available at: https:// emedicine.medscape.com. Feb 28, 2018. Assessed on 4th February 2019.

Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mo BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane database syst Rev. 2012;3:cd001233.

Murphy DJ. Labour: normal and abnormal. In: Kenny LC, Myles JE. Obstetrics by ten teachers. 20th edition. CRC Press. 2017;193-232.

Gelber S, Sciscione A. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labour induction. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;49(3):642-57.

Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods of induction of labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2001;4:CD001233.

Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Brian L, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, et al. Labour induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30mls compared with 60mls. A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1239-45.

Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Tovbin J, Arieli S, Caspi E, Bukovsky I. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with extra-aminiotic catheter balloon: clinical experience and review. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:55-60.

Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Marth JN Jr. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:33-8.

Prager M, Eneroth-Grimfors E, Edlund M, Marions L. A randomized controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour indcution. BJOG. 2008;115:1443-50.

Sciscione A, Larkin M, O'shea A, Pollock M, Hofman M, Colmorgan G. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:751-4.

Embrey MP, Mollision BG. The unfavorable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet gynecol Br common W. 1967;74:44-8.

Zhong B. How to calculate sample size in Randomized Controlled Trials? Jour Thoracic Diz. 2009;1(1):51-4.

Umeora OUJ. Induction/ Stimulation/ Augmentation of labour. In: Umeora OUJ, Esike COU, Eze JN. The Guide: Protocols for management of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Patients in the tropics. 1st Ed. Uncle-Chyk Concepts. 2017;81-7.

Miller JL. Apgar Score. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com. 2018. Accessed on 19th January 2021.

Olusanya O, Okpere E, Ezimokhai M. The importance of social class in voluntary fertility control in a developing country. West Afr J Med. 1985;4(4):205-12.

Indira I, Latha G, Narayanamma VL. Comparative study of induction of labour with Foley catheter inflated to 30mls versus 60mls. J. Clin Sci Res. 2016;5:153-9.

Wijepala J, Najimundeen M. Comparism of 30mls and 60mls Foley catheter for cervical ripening. Euro Sci Jour. 2013;9(6):1857-881.

Delany S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, Paul K, et al. Predictors of Caesarean delivery in women undergoing labour induction with a Foley ballon. J matern fetal neonatal Med. 2015;28(9):1000-4.

Manish P, Rathore S, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A, Jeyseelan V, Matheus JE. A randomised controlled trial comapring 30mls and 80 mls foley catherter for induction of labour after previous caeserean section. Available at https://journals.sagepub.com. Assessed on 17th March 2019.

Sandberg EM, Schepers EM, Sitter RLV, Huisman CMA, Wijngaarden WJV. Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mls or 60mls: A randomised controlled trial . Eur J obstet Gynecol. Repro Biol. 2017;211:150-5.

Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ. A randomized trial comapring a 30 mls and 80 mls foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. AM J Obstet and Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1632-6.