DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222270
Published: 2022-08-29

Assessment of coronary slow flow and its implications

Rajeev Ranjan, Santanu Das, M. Azizul Haque, Pritam Kumar Chatterjee

Abstract


Background: CAG is seen as the gold standard for the diagnosis of epicardial coronary artery disease. The clinical significance of coronary microvascular dysfunction has not been given much attention as epicardial coronary artery disease. Coronary slow flow phenomenon is another independent entity which is less studied and treatment plan and prognosis are not yet established. The objective of this study was to provide better understanding about the presence and pathophysiologic significance of coronary slow flow phenomena in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) for various indications by corrected TIMI frame count (CFTC) in vessels without any flow limiting disease.

Methods: We measured CTFC in patients enrolled for CAG. We compared CTFC among different presentations and in different arteries. We also compared coronary slow flow phenomenon to normal flow in coronaries and its correlation to risk factors

Results: We found that coronary flow was significantly slower in non-infarct related arteries (NIRA) in the setting of ST segment elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI) with no obstructive epicardial lesion as compared to coronary flow in absence of acute myocardial infraction (AMI). Significant slow flow was present in NIRA in STEMI compared to NSTEMI. Similarly slow flow was noted in unstable angina compared to chronic stable angina patients. Predominantly involved vessel was left anterior descending artery (LAD).

Conclusions: Coronary flow was slower in NIRA in the setting of STEMI and NSTEMI with no obstructive epicardial lesion as compared to coronary flow in absence of AMI.


Keywords


Coronary slow flow, NIRA, NSTEMI, STEMI

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kaski JC. Pathophysiology and management of patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X). Circulation. 2004;109:568-72.

Lanza GA, Crea F. Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2317-25.

Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, Santoro GM, Buonamici P, Cerisano G, et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodelling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:1121-6.

Tambe AA, Demany MA, Zimmerman HA, Mascarenhas E. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries: a new angiographic finding. Am Heart J. 1972;84:66-71.

Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rizzo MJ, Ryan KA, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, et al. Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) study group. Circulation. 1999;99(15):1945-50.

Mehta A, Passey R, Sawhney JPN. Clinical profile of patients of angina with slow flow and normal coronary angiogram. Indian Heart J. 2005;57:(5).

Nilavan A, Swaminathan N, Ravishankar G. Clinical profile of coronary slow flow phenomenon in south Indian population. Int J Scient Res. 2019;8(6).

Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Horowitz JD. The coronary slow flow phenomenon- a new coronary microvascular disorder. Cardiology. 2002;97(4):197-202.

Mukhopadhyay S, Kumar M, Yusuf J, Gupta VK, Tyagi S. Risk factors and angiographic profile of coronary slow flow (CSF) phenomenon in North Indian population: an observational study. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(3):405-9.

Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93(5):879-88.

Gibson CM, Ryan KA, Murphy SA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, Giugliano RP, et al. Impaired coronary blood flow in nonculprit arteries in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. The TIMI Study Group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(4):974-82.

Gibson CM, Goel M, Murphy SA, Dotani I, Marble SJ, Deckelbaum LI, et al. Global impairment of coronary blood flow in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (a RESTORE substudy) 1. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(12):1375-7.

Marks DS, Gudapati S, Prisant LM, Weir B, diDonato-Gonzalez C, Waller JL, et al. Mortality in patients with microvascular disease. J Clin Hypertens. 2004;6(6):304-9.

Yilmaz H, Demir I, Uyar Z. Clinical and coronary angiographic characteristics of patients with coronary slow flow. Acta Cardiol. 2008;63:579-84.

Gibson CM, Ryan KA, Murphy SA, Mesley R, Marble SJ, Giugliano RP, et al. Impaired coronary blood flow in nonculprit arteries in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. The TIMI study group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(4):974-82.

Gibson CM, Chen M, Angeja BG, Murphy SA, Marble SJ, Barron HV, et al. Precordial ST-segment depression in inferior myocardial infarction is associated with slow flow in the non-culprit left anterior descending artery. J Thrombos Thrombolys. 2002;13(1):9-12.

Gregorini L, Marco J, Kozàkovà M, Palombo C, Anguissola GB, Marco I, et al. α-Adrenergic blockade improves recovery of myocardial perfusion and function after coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999;99(4):482-90.