DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20162260

A comparative study of endotracheal intubation as per intubation difficulty score, using Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes with manual-in-line axial stabilization of cervical spine in adult patients

Nilesh Sarvaiya, Deepali Pankaj Thakur, Bharati Anil Tendolkar

Abstract


Background: The different types of laryngoscopes have been invented to improve the laryngoscopic view of the glottis in normal and difficult airway which helps anaesthesiologists to safeguard the airway during anaesthesia. Patients with cervical spine injury have deleterious compression forces on the spinal cord and that should be avoided by taking protective measures which include application of rigid collar, a forehead tape and manual-in-line axial stabilisation (MILAS). The objective of the study was to evaluate the ease of intubation with Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscope as per intubation difficulty score (IDS) with manual-in-line axial stabilization of cervical spine.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, 100 adults of ASA I-II, aged 18 to 60 years, with Mallampati classification I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with oral endotracheal intubation were included. Fifty patients were intubated using Airtraq (Group A). Another fifty patients were intubated using McCoy laryngoscope (Group B). During intubation with both devices, neck was immobilized using MILAS. Ease of intubation as per IDS, insertion of device as per Likert scale, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, number of attempts, haemodynamic changes and complications were compared for both devices.

Results: Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. There is no significant difference observed in the heart rate,  systolic and diastolic blood pressure during device insertion, intubation and up to 10 minutes after intubation in Airtraq and McCoy group. There is statistically significant difference in number of intubation attempts, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation in both groups. As per Likert scale, ease of insertion of device was statistically insignificant between two groups. McCoy group had statistically significant higher intubation difficulty scores (2.9±0.68) compared to Airtraq group (0.56±0.54) (p=0.000). All patients in Airtraq group showed Cormack and Lehane grade 1, while 30% patients in McCoy group had Cormack and Lehane grade more than 1.

Conclusions: The Airtraq facilitates the ease of intubation by providing a better view of the larynx as compared to McCoy laryngoscope in patients with manual-in-line axial stabilization of cervical spine.

 


Keywords


Airtraq, McCoy laryngoscope, MILAS, IDS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy in a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:469-77.

Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:182-8.

Maharaj CH, O’Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:1093-9.

Durga P, Kaur J, Ahmed SY, Kaniti G, Ramachandran G. Comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® and Mc Coy laryngoscope in the presence of rigid cervical collar simulating cervical immobilisation for traumatic cervical spine injury. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56:529-34.

Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy J, Fournier J, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty score (IDS): Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterising the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesiology. 1997;87:1290-7.

Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15:625-32.

Smith CE, Pinchak AB, Sidhu TS, Radesic BP, Pinchak AC, Hagen JF. Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: Fiberoptic verses conventional laryngoscopy. Anaesthesiology. 1999;91:1253-9.

Heath KJ. The effect of laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilisation techniques. Anesthesia. 1994;49:843-5.

Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM. Cervical spine motion: A fluoroscopic comparison of the Airtraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesiology. 2009;111:97-101.

Schalte G, Scheid U, Rex S, Coburn M, Fiedler B, Rossaint R, et al. The use of the Airtraq optical laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in high risk cardio surgical patients. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:425.

Maharaj CH, Buckley E, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Anaesthesiology. 2007;107:53-9.

Koh JC, Lee JS, Lee YW, Chang CH. Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59:314-8.

Arslan ZI, Yildiz T, Baykara ZN, Solak M, Toker K. Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilization of cervical spine: A comparison of Airtraq and LMA CTrack devices. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:1332-6.

Tolon MA, Ola M. Zanaty, Shafshak W, Arida E. Comparative study between the use of Macintosh Laryngoscope and Airtraq in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2012;48(2):179-85.