A study of aerobic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis in reproductive age group women (15-45 years) and their sensitivity pattern

Authors

  • Sangeetha K. T. Department of Microbiology, Dr B. R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka
  • Saroj Golia Department of Microbiology, Dr B. R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka
  • Vasudha C. L. Department of Microbiology, Dr B. R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150615

Keywords:

Aerobic vaginitis, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli

Abstract

Background: Aerobic vaginitis (AV) is caused by a displacement of the healthy vaginal Lactobacillus species with aerobic pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus that triggers a localized vaginal inflammatory immune response. AV if it is not diagnosed and treated early, especially during pregnancy can place the health of both the mother and the foetus at risk as it is associated with preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and chorioamnionitis. Hence the present study aims at analysing the prevalence of aerobic vaginitis in females in the reproductive age group (15-45 years) with special reference to pregnancy, pathogens involved and their antibiogram.

Methods: Over one year period, high vaginal swabs were collected from 125 women with clinical suspicion of vaginitis. They were then subjected to Gram’ staining and culture was made onto blood agar, chocolate agar and MacConkey agar and incubated aerobically at 37 0c for 24 hours. The AV score was determined and the organisms were then identified and antibiotic sensitivity test of isolates were performed.

Results: The prevalence of Aerobic vaginitis in this study was 20.8% (26/125) and the most common age group affected was between 26-30 years. Out of the 26 positive cases, 21 samples yielded monobacterial growth and 5 cases polybacterial growth. The most common organism isolated was Enterococcus faecalis (32.26%), followed by Escherichia coli (25.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (19.35%) and β-hemolytic streptococci (9.68%). Antibiotics like β–lactams/ β–lactamase inhibitor combinations, vancomycin and linezolid were found to be more effective against all Gram positive isolates whereas the Gram negative isolates were more sensitive towards β–lactams/ β–lactamase inhibitor combination, aminoglycosides and meropenem.

Conclusions: This study emphasized on the need to identify the aerobic vaginal pathogens associated with vaginitis especially in reproductive age group women which can go a long way in preventing the adverse outcomes associated with pregnancy and also ensures the necessity to determine the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the pathogens which can aid in making a suitable therapeutic choice for 'aerobic vaginitis' by considering an antibiotic that is characterized by an intrinsic activity against the majority of bacteria of faecal origin, bactericidal effect and without any interference with the vaginal microbiota.

 

References

Fan A, Yue Y, Geng N, Zhang H, Wang Y, Xue F. Aerobic vaginitis and mixed infections: comparison of clinical and laboratory findings. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:329–35.

Schorge J, Schaffer J, Halvorson L, Hoffman B, Bradshaw K, Cunningham F. G. Williams Gynecology, Second Edition, New York : McGraw-Hill Company; 2012. Chap 3: p. 547.

Forbes BA, Daniel FS, Alice SW. Baily and Scott’s diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. USA: Mosby Elsevier Company; 2007; 860.

Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson C. Abnormal bacterial colonization of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994;308:295–8.

McDonald HM, O’Loughlin JA, Jolley PT, Vigneswarab R, McDonald PJ. Changes in vaginal flora during pregnancy and association with preterm birth. J Inf Dis. 1994;170:728–32.

Rosenstein IJ, Morgan DJ, Sheehan M, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D. Effect of topical clindamycin on bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy [abstract]. Second International Meeting on Bacterial Vaginosis, Aspen, Colorado, Sept 17– 19,1998.

Donder GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG. 2002;109:34–43.

Krauss-Silva L, Almada-Horta A, Alves MB, Camacho KG, L Moreira M E, Braga A. Basic vaginal pH, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis: prevalence in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, a prospective study in a low socioeconomic and multiethnic South American population. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014,14:107.

Forbes BA, Daniel FS, Alice SW. Baily and Scott’s diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. USA: Mosby Elsevier Company; 2007.p.867.

Mackie TJ, McCartney JE. Laboratory strategy in the diagnosis of infective syndromes. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Practical Medical Microbiology.14th ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p.796.

Allen SD, Janda WM, Koneman EW, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC. Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2005.p.1443-1535.

CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2012. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-second informational supplement. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI: 2012; M100-S22.

Khan I, Khan UA. A hospital based study of frequency of aerobic pathogens in vaginal infections. J Rawal Med Coll. 2004;29 (1):22-5.

Cheng Ling; Wang JiaYi The vaginal micro-flora of aerobic vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis Zhongguo Weishengtaxixue Zazhi / Chinese Journal of Microecology. 2009;21(12):1107-9.

Razzak MSA, Al-Charrakh AH, AL-Greitty BH. Relationship between lactobacilli and opportunistic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis. North Am J Med Sci 2011;3:185-92.

Donders GG, Van CK, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, et al. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obst Gynecol 2009;116:1315–24.

Mumtaz S, Ahmed M, Aftab I, Akhtar N, UlHassan M, Hamid A. Aerobic vaginal pathogens and their sensitivity pattern. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20 (1):113-7.

Zarbo G, Coco L, Leanza V, Genovese F, Leanza G, D’Agati A, et al. Aerobic vaginitis during pregnancy. Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;2(2):7-11.

Sobel JD, Reichman O, Misra D, Yoo W. Prognosis and Treatment of Desquamative Inflammatory Vaginitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:850-5.

Tempera G, Abbadessa G, Bonfiglio G, Cammarat E, Cianci A, Corsello S. Topical kanamycin: an effective therapeutic option in aerobic vaginitis. J Chemother. 2006;18:409–14.

Tariq N, Jaffery T, Ayub R, Alam AY, Javid MH, Shafique S. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of aerobic bacterial vaginal isolates. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006;16 (3):196-9.

Hafiz S, Hafiz AN, Ali L, Chughtai AS, Memon B, Ahmad A, Hussain S, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; a multicentre study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2002;52:312–5.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-12

How to Cite

K. T., S., Golia, S., & C. L., V. (2017). A study of aerobic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis in reproductive age group women (15-45 years) and their sensitivity pattern. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(9), 2268–2273. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150615

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles