DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20163314

Whether retrograde pyelography mandatory for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial

Manoj Biswas, Ankur Mittal, Rajeev Sarpal, Shikhar Agrawal, Ravinder Pal, Karamaveer Singh

Abstract


Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) technique was introduced a new era in the management of renal calculi, and day by day many changes occurred regarding the puncture points to an opaque stone as a guided landmark. We aim at comparing the outcome of many renal calculi with or without retrograde pyelography (RGP).

Methods: In a randomized clinical trial 110 cases with opaque renal calculi for PCNL with stone in the calyces, in the pelvis, both in the calyx and pelvis, simultaneously, included in 2 year study. They were randomized in 2 groups, non RGP (56) and RGP (54), called interventional and control group respectively.

Results: 2 groups are analyzed according to gender, age, duration of operation and hospital stay, past history of any surgical intervention on kidney and stone size. Outcome was evaluated with plain x-ray and USG abdomen. No differences in outcome were observed in between the two groups.

Conclusions: Present findings conclude that there is no difference in major clinical outcome between the 2 groups. So we can say RGP is not mandatory for selected patients while doing PCNL


Keywords


Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Retrograde pyelography, Ureteric catheter, PCNL, RGP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biyabani SR, Liew L, Esuvaranathan K, Li MK. Evaluation of the current technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a tertiary care urology setting in Singapore. BJU Int. 2002;90(Suppl 2):133.

Delavierre D, Fournier G, Mangin P. Percutaneous drainage nephrostomy guided by ultrasound. Apropos of 80 adult cases. J Urol (Paris). 1989;95:319-29.

Inglis JA, Tolley DA, Law J. Radiation safety during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol. 1989;63:591-3.

Karami H, Gholamrezaie HR. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol. 2004;18:475-6.

Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13:235-41.

Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Zagoria RJ, Dyer RB, Streem SB, Assimos DG. Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urol. 2003;170:45-7

McDougalll EM, Ewangelos NL, Dinlenc CZ, Smith AD. Percutaneous approach to the upper urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, ReticA B, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ. Campbells Urolgy 8th (ed.). Philadelphia, Saunders publication. 2002;98:3323-4.

Montanari E, Serrago M, Esposito N. Ultrasoundfluoroscopy guided access to the intrarenal excretory system. Ann Urol (Paris). 1999;33:168-81.

Patel U, Hussain FF. Percutaneous nephrostomy of nondilated renal collecting systems with fluoroscopic guidance: technique and results. Radiology. 2004;233:226-33.

Rao PN, Faulkner K, Sweeney JK, Asbury DL, Sambrook P, Blacklock NJ. Radiation dose to patient and staff during percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Br J Urol. 1987;59:508-12.

Roth M. Experiences with sonographically guided percutaneous nephrostomy. Z Urol Nephrol. 1986;79:147-54.

Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH. Anatomical relationship between the renal venous arrangement and the kidney collecting system. J Urol. 1990;144:1089-93.

Varkarakis J, Su LM, Hsu TH: Air embolism from pneumopyelography. J Urol. 2003;169:267.