DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173990

Yield of different bronchoscopic techniques in diagnosis of lung cancer

Vipul Kumar, K. B. Gupta, Ritu Aggarwal

Abstract


Background: Lung cancer is generally diagnosed during late stage of the disease so early diagnosis of lung cancer is very important to reduce lung cancer death rate. Flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy revolutionized early diagnosis of lung cancer as it provides sufficient cytologic and histologic specimens in form of bronchial brushings, broncho-alveolar lavage and bronchial forceps biopsy. Cytologic techniques are safe, economical, and provide quick results. They not only complement tissue biopsies in the diagnosis of lung cancer but are also comparable in yield.

Methods: The present study analyzes cytology of Bronchoalveolar lavage, Bronchial Brushings and histology of bronchial biopsy in 45 patients diagnosed as lung cancer by fiber-optic bronchoscopy. Age, gender, smoking habits, various histological types of malignancies, and yield of various bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of lung cancer were evaluated.

Results: Of the 45 cases with confirmed diagnosis, 37 (82.22%) were males and 8 (17.17%) were females with male to female ratio of 4.6:1. The mean age in this study group was 54.71 years. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common primary bronchogenic tumor (62.22%) followed by adeno carcinoma (26.66%). The overall diagnostic yield of fiber-optic bronchoscopy procedures was 100% (32/32 patients) in bronchoscopically visible tumors. Bronchial biopsy was most sensitive (100%) followed by Bronchial Brushings (88%) and BAL (81.25%). However, in non-visible tumors, biopsy, brush and BAL yielded diagnostic specimens for lung cancer in 84.61%, 76.92% and 46.15% of patients respectively.

Conclusions: Lung cancer is a common malignancy with male preponderance. Bronchial biopsy has a very high diagnostic yield. Cytopathological examination of bronchial brushings and broncho-alveolar lavage not only complement tissue biopsies in the diagnosis of lung cancer but have comparable diagnostic yield.


Keywords


Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial biopsy, Bronchial brushings, Broncho-alveolar lavage, Lung cancer, Squamous cell carcinoma

Full Text:

PDF

References


Behera D, Balamugesh T. Lung cancer in India. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2004;46:269‑81.

Agarwal A, Ghotekar LH, Garbyal RS, Mital VP, Chokhani R. Evaluation of pulmonary malignancies in Kathmandu valley and role of bronchoscopic techniques in diagnosis of such cases. J Indian Academy Clin Med. 2003;4(2):127-33.

Rivera MP, Detterbeck F, Mehta AC. American college of chest physicians, diagnosis of lung cancer: the guidelines. Chest, 2003;123:129S-36.

Zavala DC. Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy: techniques and results of biopsy in 600 patients. Chest. 1975;68:12-9.

Schreiber G, McCrory DC. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence. Chest. 2003;123:115S-28.

Rennard SI. Bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of cancer. Lung. 1990;168:1035-40.

Kashyap S, Mohapatra PR, Negi RS. Pattern of primary lung cancer among bidi smokers in North-Western Himalayan region of India. Lung Cancer. 2003;41(2):S111.

Gupta D, Boffetta P, Gaborieau V, Jindal SK. Risk factors of lung cancer in Chandigarh, India. Indian J Med Res. 2001;113:142-50.

Jindal SK, Behera D. Clinical spectrum of primary lung cancer review of Chandigarh experience of 10 years. Lung India. 1990;8:94-8.

Gupta RC, Purohit SD, Sharma MP, Bhardwaj S. Primary bronchogenic carcinoma: clinical profile of 279 cases from mid-west Rajasthan. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1998;40:109-16.

Thippanna G, Venu K, Gopalkrishnaiah V, Reddy PNS, Sai Charan BG. A profile of lung cancer patients in Hyderabad. J Indian Med Assoc. 1999;97:357-9.

Liam CK, Pang YK, Poosparajah S. Diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopic procedures in lung cancer patients according to tumor location. Singapore Med J. 2007;48:625‑31.

Mak VH, Johnston ID, Hetzel MR, Grubb C. Value of washings and brushings at fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Thorax. 1990;45:373-6.

Garg S, Handa U, Mohan H, Janmeja AK. Comparative analysis of various cyto-histological techniques in diagnosis of lung diseases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:26‑31.

Truong LD, Underwood RD, Greenberg SD, McLarty JW. Diagnosis and typing of lung carcinomas by cytopathologic methods. A review of 108 cases. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:379‑84.

Chopra SK, Genovesi MG, Simmons DH, Gothe B. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer comparison of pre-and pro bronchoscopy sputa, washings, brushings and biopsies. Chest. 1997;111:522-3.

Shroff CP. Abrasive bronchial brushing cytology. A preliminary study of 200 specimens for the diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic broncho-pulmonary lesions. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:101-7.

Wong PC, Lee J, Lam FM, Wong CF, Chau CH, Yew WW. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1999;54:394-8.

Cataluna JJ, Perpina M, Greses JV, Calvo V, Padilla JD, Paris F. Cell type accuracy of bronchial biopsy specimens in primary lung cancer. Chest. 1996;109:1199-203.

Bhat N, Nazeir MJ, Bashir H, Bashir N, Farooq S, Fatima K, et al. Correlation of bronchial biopsy with bronchoalveolar lavage in lung malignancies. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4:428-35.