Classical open lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for disc herniations among manual labourers in India

Authors

  • Surendra Kumar Chellarapu Department of Neurosurgery, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Satya Vara Prasad Kadali Department of Neurosurgery, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Raja Sekhar B. Department of Neurosurgery, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Raman B. V. S. Department of Neurosurgery, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175127

Keywords:

Low back pain, Lower limb radiculopathy, Lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, Sciatica

Abstract

Background: Lumbar disc herniations are most common at L4/5 and L5/S1 levels and this is most prevalent condition among manual laborers. The aim of the study to analyze the clinical presentation, age and sex distribution, immediate postoperative complications and long-term complications/recurrence of symptoms and to formulate recommendations to avoid complications and recurrence of symptoms.

Methods: This is a retrospective study which includes 250 patients operated for lumbar disc herniations at L4/5 and L5/S1 levels. A detailed history of presenting complaints, clinical examination and corresponding findings on imaging are correlated. In all these patients, there was severe symptomatology with failed conservative management which necessitated classical open lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. These patients were followed for a period of 5 to 10 years.

Results: Assessment of outcome was done using the modified Macnab criteria. The overall success rate was 96% in our series. Post operatively, 9.2% of them experienced localized low back pain which is mild to moderate and being treated with NSAIDS and exercises. 2.4% developed residual disc herniation or hypertrophic fibrotic scar at the operated site which needed surgical intervention. 2% developed spondylolysis and spondylolesthesis at the level of previous surgery, and 4.4% developed adjacent disc herniations.

Conclusions: The overall success rate was 96% in our series. In addition to removal of herniated disc other compressing elements like hypertrophied Ligamentumflavum, facet arthropathy and narrowed spinal canal diameter are also addressed with open procedure. To prevent later complications, these patients are supposed to avoid strenuous work, lifting weights, torsion and jerky movements, faulty posture at work and rest, gait training, crouching, sitting on the floor and haunches.

References

Joffe SN. A census of the edition of 1555 of Andreas Vesalius' De Humani Corporis Fabrica. Int Arch Med. 2009;2(1):26.

Luschka HV. Die halbgelenke des menschichen korpers. Berlin; 1858.

Dandy We. Serious complications of ruptured intervertebral disks. J Americ Medic Assoc. 1942;119(6):474-7.

Mixter Wj, Ayer Jb. Herniation or rupture of the intervertebral disc into the spinal canal: Report of thirty-four cases. N Eng J Medic. 1935;213(9):385-93.

Barr JS. Failed surgery for low back and sciatic pain. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45:1553.

Nachemson A. The load on lumbar disks in different positions of the body. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1966;45:107-22.

Horal J. The clinical appearance of low back disorders in the city of Gothenburg, Sweden: comparisons of incapacitated probands with matched controls. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1969;40(sup118):1-9.

Hakelius A. Prognosis in sciatica: a clinical follow-up of surgical and non-surgical treatment. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1970;41(sup129):1-76.

Yone K, Sakou T. Usefulness of Posner’s definition of spinal instability for selection of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12:40-4

Mac Nab I. Backache. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1977: pp 84-103.

De Palma AF, Rothman RH. The intervertebral disc. Saunders Limited.; 1970.

Ganz JC. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Postoperative results in terms of preoperative posture-related pain. J Neurosurg. 1990;72:71-4

Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:26-33.

Waddell G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, Graham JD, Hall H, McCulloch JA. Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. JBJS. 1979;61(2):201-7.

Davis RA. A longterm analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1984;80:415-21.

Kobrine A, Bucy PC. Spondylolisthesis following lumbar disc surgery in a child: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1971;34(4):563-8.

Smith L, Brown JE. Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc lesion by direct injection of chymopapain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967;49:502-19.

Choy DS, Ascher PW, Saddekni S, Alkaitis D, Liebler W, Hughes J, Diwan S, Altman P. Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression: A New Therapeutic Modality. Spine. 1992;17(8):949-56.

Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsberg L, Hoaglund FT, Morris J. Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy using a new aspiration probe. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1137-40.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-25

How to Cite

Chellarapu, S. K., Kadali, S. V. P., B., R. S., & B. V. S., R. (2017). Classical open lumbar laminectomy and discectomy for disc herniations among manual labourers in India. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 5(12), 5156–5161. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20175127

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles