A comparison of propofol and etomidate as anaesthetic agents for elective non-cardiac surgery

Authors

  • Amit Kumar Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Pacific Institute of Medical Science, Umarda, Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Kamlesh Kanwar Shekhawat Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Pacific Institute of Medical Science, Umarda, Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Roma Sharma Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Mata Chanan Devi Hospital, New Dehli, India
  • Pramod Mangwana Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Mata Chanan Devi Hospital, New Dehli, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184062

Keywords:

Etomidate, Hemodynamic parameters, Induction, Propofol, Postoperative

Abstract

Background: To compare propofol and etomidate as anaesthetic agents for elective non-cardiac surgery with respect to stability of haemodynamic parameters, systemic side effects and quality of induction.

Methods: Randomised, blinded study of 100 patients posted for elective non-cardia surgery under general anaesthesia, divided in to two group. In group P(n=50) induction was achieved with injection Propofol 1mg/kg, whereas in group E(n=50), it was achieved with injection etomidate 0.3mg/kg after premedication with injection midazolam 0.04mg/kg and fentanyl 2µg/kg in both the group. Hemodynamic parameters like, heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, Mean BP and induction time in seconds, pain on injection, myoclonus, post-operative nausea, vomiting were recorded at different time intervals (base line, at induction, immediately after intubation and 1,3,5 and 15 min after intubation).

Results: There was no statistically difference was found in demographic profile and baseline hemodynamic parameters but significant different was found in intraoperative mean HR, SBP, DBP, MBP at various time intervals, and our result was more in favour of E group as compare to P, in which above recorded vital parameters were decreased more than E and induction time was also faster in E as compare to P. Pain on injection and post-operative nausea, vomiting was more in group P as compare to E, however the myoclonus movements was more in E group as compare to P but statistically not significant.

Conclusions: Etomidate is a better intravenous induction agent of anaesthesia than Propofol in hemodynamically unstable patient also as it has faster onset of action with less pain and post-operative nausea, vomiting with good hemodynamic stability.

References

McEvoy GK, Ed. Propofol. In: AHFS Drug Information 2004. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. 2004:1898-1906.

Sarkar M, Laussen PC, Zurakowski D, Shukla A, Kussman B, Odegard KC. Hemodynamic responses to etomidate on induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesthes Analges. 2005 Sep 1;101(3):645-50.

Morel J, Salard M, Castelain C, Bayon MC, Lambert P, Vola M, et al. Haemodynamic consequences of etomidate administration in elective cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blinded study. Br J Anaesthes. 2011 Jun 17;107(4):503-9.

Paris A, Philipp M, Tonner PH, Steinfath M, Lohse M, Scholz J, et al. Activation of α2B-adrenoceptors mediates the cardiovascular effects of etomidate. Anesthesiology: J Am Soc Anesthesiologis. 2003 Oct 1;99(4):889-95.

Kim TK, Park IS. Comparative study of brain protection effect between thiopental and etomidate using bispectral index during temporary arterial occlusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011 Dec;50(6):497.

Steward DJ. A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room. Canadian Anaesthetists’ Soc J. 1975 Jan 1;22(1):111-3.

Zhang GH, Sun L. Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction. Chinese Med J. 2009 Oct 5;122(19):2330.

Saricaoglu F, Uzun S, Arun O, Arun F, Aypar U. A clinical comparison of etomidate-lipuro, propofol and admixture at induction. Saudi J Anaesthes. 2011 Jan;5(1):62.

Skinner HJ, Biswas A, Mahajan RP. Evaluation of intubating conditions with rocuronium and either propofol or etomidate for rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia. 1998 Jul;53(7):702-6.

Singh R, Choudhury M, Kapoor PM, Kiran U. A randomized trial of anesthetic induction agents in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Cardiac Anaesthes. 2010 Sep 1;13(3):217.

Kaushal RP, Vatal A, Pathak R. Effect of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve and aortic valve replacement surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Cardiac Anaesthes. 2015 Apr;18(2):172.

Larsen R, Rathgeber J, Bagdahn A, Lange H, Rieke H. Effects of propofol on cardiovascular dynamics and coronary blood flow in geriatric patients: A comparison with etomidate. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:25-31.

Pandey AK, Makhija N, Chauhan S, Das S, Kiran U, Bisoi AK, Lakshmy R. The effects of etomidate and propofol induction on hemodynamic and endocrine response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass. World J Cardiovas Surg. 2012 Sep 21;2(03):48.

Altmayer P, Grundmann U, Ziehmer M, Larsen R. Comparative study on bioavailability and side effects of a new galenic formulation of etomidate. Anasthesiol Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie. 1993 Jan 1;28(7):415-9.

Nyman Y, Von Hofsten K, Palm C, Eksborg S, Lönnqvist PA. Etomidate-® Lipuro is associated with considerably less injection pain in children compared with propofol with added lidocaine. Br J Anaesthes. 2006 Aug 16;97(4):536-9.

Aggarwal S, Goyal VK, Chaturvedi SK, Mathur V, Baj B, Kumar A. A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia. Brazilian J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jun;66(3):237-41.

Schwarzkopf KR, Hueter L, Simon M, Fritz HG. Midazolam pre-treatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonic movements. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Feb;31(1):18-20.

Isitemiz I, Uzman S, Toptaş M, Vahapoglu A, Gül YG, Inal FY, Akkoc I. Prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: Which is superior: Fentanyl, midazolam, or a combination? A retrospective comparative study. Med Sci Monitor: Int Med J Experiment Clin Res. 2014;20:262.

Mayer M, Doenicke A, Nebauer AE, Hepting L. Propofol and etomidate-Lipuro for induction of general anesthesia. Hemodynamics, vascular compatibility, subjective findings and postoperative nausea. Der Anaesthesist. 1996 Nov;45(11):1082-4.

St Pierre M, Dunkel M, Rutherford A, Hering W. Does etomidate increase postoperative nausea? A double-blind controlled comparison of etomidate in lipid emulsion with propofol for balanced anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;17(10):634-41.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-25

How to Cite

Kumar, A., Shekhawat, K. K., Sharma, R., & Mangwana, P. (2018). A comparison of propofol and etomidate as anaesthetic agents for elective non-cardiac surgery. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 6(10), 3454–3460. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184062

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles