DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20190917

Epidemiological study of neural tube defects in Jammu division, India

Virender Singh, Sachi Raina, Deepika Dewan, Sunil Raina, Vikram Dogra

Abstract


Background: Prevalence and spectrum of neural tube defects has undergone seasonal and secular variations in different regions of the world since the turn of last century. However precise etiology inspite of lot of research has not been clearly elucidated.

Methods: The study was conducted in Government Medical College Hospital and SMGS Hospital Jammu in patients diagnosed to have a neural tube defect from birth to 19 years. History regarding sociodemographic profile, antenatal history and significant birth history was elicited. Complete general physical examination, Local examination of the lesion was carried out and neural tube defects were classified. All the cases were subjected to ultrasound head to determine ventricular size and rule out hydrocephalus. The data was entered in Microsoft Excel and results were presented in form of percentages and proportions.

Results: Maximum children admitted were in the age group of <1 month and belonged to Jammu district. Commonest anomaly seen was lumbosacral meningomyelocele with associated hydrocephalus and neural deficit. Mothers who gave birth to an NTD affected child were commonly in the age group of 20-30 years, with commonest NTD affected sib being 1stborn and most of parents being from very low socio-economic strata of society. Only 7 mothers had received antenatal advice with ultrasound and almost none had received folic acid either before or after conception.

Conclusions: Neural tube defects appear to be fairly common anomaly among females of lower socioeconomic strata, living in far flung mountainous regions of the state, devoid of proper health care facilities and education.

Keywords


Encepahalocele, Jammu, Meningomyelocele, Meningocele, Neural tube defect

Full Text:

PDF

References


Shurtleff DB. Epidemiology of neural tube defects and folic acid. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2004 Dec;1(1):5.

Freeman N.V, Burge M.D, Griffiths M et al. Surgery of the new born. 1st ed, Churchill Livingstone. 1994: 573-597.

Ellenbogen RG, Springer SC, Windle ML. Neural Tube Defects in the neonatal period. E Medicine Clinical Reference. 2006;1-11. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1825866-overview.

Airede IK. Neural tube defects in the middle belt of Nigeria. J Trop Pediatr. 38;1992:27-9.

Mahadevan B, Bhat BV. Neural tube defects in Pondicherry. Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Jul 1;72(7):557-9.

Asindi A, Shehri A. The incidence of neural tube defects among admission at a regional referral hospital in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2001;21(1-2):26-9.

Aguiar MJ, Campos ÂS, Aguiar RA, Lana AM, Magalhães RL, Babeto LT. Neural tube defects and associated factors among liveborn and stillborn infants. J Pediatr. 2003 Apr; 79 (2): 129-34.

Campbell LR, Dayton DH, Sohal GS. Neural tube defects: a review of human and animal studies on the etiology of neural tube defects. Teratol. 1986 Oct;34(2):171-87.

Todoroff K, Shaw GM. Prior spontaneous abortion, prior elective termination, interpregnancy interval, and risk of neural tube defects. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;151(5):505-11.

Vrijheid M, Dolk H, Stone D, Abramsky L, Alberman E, Scott JE. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk of congenital anomaly. Arch Dis Childhood. 2000 May 1;82(5):349-52.

Cherian A, Seena S, Bullock RK, Antony AC. Incidence of neural tube defects in the least-developed area of India: a population-based study. Lancet. 2005 Sep 10;366(9489):930-1.