A clinico-pathological study of lichenoid tissue reactions/interface dermatitis

Authors

  • Deepti Dixit Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
  • Sunita S. Vernekar Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
  • Sujata S. Giriyan Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191302

Keywords:

Inflammatory, Interface dermatitis, Lichenoid tissue reactions, Lichen planus

Abstract

Background: Lichenoid tissue reaction/Interface dermatitis (LTR/ID) refers to a number of clinically diverse, poorly understood and relatively uncommon inflammatory skin diseases. This study was done to understand the histopathological features of lichenoid tissue reactions in skin biopsies and to assess the concordance and disparity between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis of variants of the same.

Methods: It was a 3½ years study from January 2014 to June 2017 in the department of Pathology, KIMS, Hubballi. The present study included skin biopsies of clinically diagnosed and suspected cases and histologically diagnosed cases of LTRs. Skin biopsies received were routinely paraffin processed and H&E stained to study the microscopic features.

Results: Out of 166 skin biopsies studied, 148 were histologically confirmed as LTR with majority being of lichen planus (LP) (91.22%). Classical lichen planus was the most common variant of lichen planus among lichen planus cases. Male:female ratio was 1.2:1. Clinico-pathological concordance was seen in 88.55% of the cases.

Conclusions: Though definite diagnosis can be made on histopathological examination, size of specimen, site of biopsy, nature and depth of biopsy, quality of sections, treatment history and inter-observer variation (both clinically and histologically) should be kept in mind which may lead to clinicopathological discordance.

References

Sontheimer RD. Lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis: Clinical and histological perspectives. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(5):1088-99.

Kumar MU, Yelikar BR, Inamadar AC, Umesh S, Singhal A, Kushtagi AV. A Clinico-pathological study of lichenoid tissue reactions-A tertiary care experience. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(2): 312-6.

Weedon D. Skin Pathology, 3rd ed. China: Elsevier; 2010:35-70.

Maheshwari GR, Mehta HH, Nikam V. Clinico-histopathological correlation for diagnosis of lichenoid interface dermatoses. J Dermatol Dermatologic Surg. 2016;20:115-24.

Hegde VK, Khadilkar UN. A clinicopathological study of interface dermatitis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2014;57:386-9.

Chauhan R, Srinath MK, Ali NM, Bhat RM, Sukumar D. Clinicopathological Study of Lichenoid Reactions: A Retrospective Analysis. J Evolution Med Dental Sci. 2015;4(32):5551-62.

Garg VK, Nangia A, Logani K, Sharma RC. Lichen Planus-a Clinico- histopathological. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2000;66(4):193-5.

Khaled A, Banu SG, Kamal M, Manzoor J, Nasir TA. A clinical and histopathological study of lichenoid eruption of skin in two tertiary care hospitals of Dhaka. Pulse. 2011;5(1):12-8.

Parihar A, Sharma S, Bhattacharya SN, Singh UR. A clinicopathological study of cutaneous lichen planus. J Dermatol Dermatologic Surg. 2015;19:21-6.

Nangia A, Kumar V, Logani KB. An immunopathological study of lichen planus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2000;66(2):76-8.

Bhattacharya M, Kaur I, Kumar B. Lichen planus: a clinical and epidemiological study. J Dermatol. 2000;27 (9):576-82.

Ellis FA. Histopathology of lichen planus based on analysis of one hundred biopsy specimens. J Invest Dermatol. 1967 Feb 1;48(2):143-8.

Mobini N, Toussaint S, Kamino H. Noninfectious erythematous, popular, and squamous diseases. In: Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Johnson BL, Murphy GF, Johnson BL, Xu X, editors. Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin. 10th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2009;169-204

Kamal T, Mufti S, Ahmad TJ. Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis: A case report. J Pakistan Assoc Dermatologists. 2015; 25 (1):73-5.

Tan LS, Chong WS. Porokeratosis in Singapore: An Asian perspective. Australasian J Dermatol. 2012;53:e40-4.

Coelho WS, Diniz LM, Filho JBDS. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. An Bras Dermatol 2006;81:297-300.

Ridley CM. Genital lichen sclerosus (lichen sclerosus et atrophicus) in childhood and adolescence. J Royal Soc Med. 1993 Feb;86(2):69.

Roujeau JC. Erythema multiforme. In: Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, Wolff K, editors. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 8th ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hills Companies; 2012:1:431-9.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-27

How to Cite

Dixit, D., Vernekar, S. S., & Giriyan, S. S. (2019). A clinico-pathological study of lichenoid tissue reactions/interface dermatitis. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(4), 1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191302

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles