DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191348

Motor nerve conduction study parameters in healthy individuals: effect of limb dominance

Binnam Shakya, Dilip Thakur, Bishnu H. Paudel, Rita Khadka, Suman Pokhrel

Abstract


Background: Nerve conduction study (NCS) is useful for evaluation of nerve, muscle, and/or neuromuscular function. Neurophysiologist interprets NCS with consideration of various anthropometric and technical parameters viz. age, gender, height, temperature etc. apart from the underlying pathology. Fewer studies have reported the effect of limb dominance on NCS. Moreover, the findings are controversial. Therefore, author aimed to investigate the effect of limb dominance on motor nerve conduction study parameters.

Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included sixty healthy individuals (44 right and 16 left handed) of either sex with age 18 to 30 years. The NCS parameters of median and ulnar nerves were assessed by stimulating it and recording from the muscle and skin overlying the nerve respectively using Digital Nihon Kohden machine. The obtained data were analyzed using independent sample t-test.

Results: Right ulnar nerve onset latency was significantly longer in left-handed individuals (1.85±0.508 ms vs 1.62±0.195 ms, p=0.012). The left ulnar nerve F wave minimum latency (25.88±0.74 ms vs 24.46±2.64 ms, p=0.002) was significantly longer in left-handed individuals. Likewise, right ulnar nerve distal latency (2.45±0.76 ms vs 2.14±0.39 ms, p=0.044), and right ulnar nerve F wave minimum (25.9±1.21 ms vs 24.85 ms±1.74, p=0.030) were significantly high in left-handed individuals.

Conclusions: NCS parameters in terms of latencies were longer in left-handed individuals. Therefore, limb dominance seems to be an important factor one should pay attention during bilateral comparison of obtained data in neurophysiological reporting of referred cases.


Keywords


Limb dominance, Motor nerves, Nerve conduction study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Milenković S, Belojević G, Kocijancić R. Aetiological factors in left-handedness. Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo. 2005;133(11-12):532-4.

Aminoff MJ. Clinical electromyography. In: Electrodiagnosis in clinical neurology. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 1999.

Chang MH, Liu LH, Lee YC, Wei SJ, Chiang HL, Hsieh PF. Comparison of sensitivity of transcarpal median motor conduction velocity and conventional conduction techniques in electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(5):984-91.

Edds MV. Hypertrophy of nerve fibers to functionally overloaded muscles. J Comparative Neurol. 1950;93(2):259-75.

Ehler E, Ridzoň P, Urban P, Mazanec R, Nakládalová M, Procházka B, et al. Ulnar nerve at the elbow–normative nerve conduction study. J Brachial Plexus Peripheral Nerve Inj. 2013;8(1):2.

Gupta N, Sanyal S, Babbar R. Sensory nerve conduction velocity is greater in left handed persons. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;52(2):189-92.

Tan Ü. Velocities of motor and sensory nerve conduction are the same for right and left arms in right-and left-handed normal subjects. Perceptual Motor Skills. 1985;60(2):625-6.

Hennessey WJ, Falco FJ, Braddom RL. Median and ulnar nerve conduction studies: normative data for young adults. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1994 Mar 1;75(3):259-64.

Bhorania SE, Ichaporia RB. Effect of limb dominance on motor nerve conduction. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;53(3):279-82.

Sathiamoorthy AN, Sathiamoorthy SS. Limb dominance and motor conduction velocity of median and ulnar nerves. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol. 1990;34(1):51-3.

Tayade MC, Latti RG. Effect of limb dominance on the nerve conduction studies in healthy subjects. Pravara Med Rev. 2011;6(2):31-3.