A prospective randomised double-blind study of comparison of efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% in lower limb surgeries

Authors

  • Basavaraj Kallapur Department of Anesthesiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India
  • Yashavanthi H. S. Medical Officer, ESIC Hospital, Peenya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • Safiya I. Sheikh Department of Anesthesiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20190538

Keywords:

Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, Effect, Patients, Surgeries

Abstract

Background: Studies comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine 0.75% in spinal anesthesia are few. The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in comparison to clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in subarachnoid block.

Methods: Patients were randomly allotted into 3 groups. Group R (n=30) patients received 3ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine +0.5ml of 0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 3.5ml. Group RD (n=30) patients received 3ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine +5μg of dexmedetomidine +0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 3.5ml. Group RC (n=30) patients received 3ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine +30μg of clonidine +0.9% normal saline to a total volume of 3.5ml. The patients and the investigator were blinded for the study.

Results: Time to reach T10 level of sensory block in group R was 7.6±1.3 min, group RC was 7.8±1.4 min and in group RD it was 7.9±1.4 min which was statistically not significant with p value 0.66. Time to reach motor onset to Bromage scale 4 was 9.8±1.4 min in group R, 10±1.4 min in group RC, 10.5±1.5 min in group RD which was statistically not significant with p value 0.24. Time to reach maximum sensory block in group R was 10.7±1.4 min, 10.6±1.1 min in group RC, 11±1.7 min in group RD which was statistically insignificant with p value 0.51.

Conclusions: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine had superior anaesthetic effects with respect to duration of sensory blockade, motor blockade and duration of analgesia compared to intrathecal clonidine.

References

Brull R, Macfarlane AJ, Chan VW. Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. Miller’s Anest. 2015;8:1684-720.

Covino BG. Pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. Brit J Anaes. 1986;58(7):701-16.

Kashimoto S, Kume M, Kumazawa T. Functional and metabolic effects of bupivacaine and lignocaine in the rat heart-lung preparation. BJA. 1990;65(4):521-6.

Reynolds F. Adverse effects of local anaesthetics. Brit J Anaes. 1987;59(1):78-95.

McDonald SB, Liu SS, Kopacz DJ, Stephenson CA. Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine a comparison to bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesthesiol: J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 1999;90(4):971-7.

Cox CR, Faccenda KA, Gilhooly C, Bannister J, Scott NB, Morrison LM. Extradural S (-)-bupivacaine: comparison with racemic RS-bupivacaine. Brit J Anaes. 1998;80(3):289-93.

Abouleish EI, Elias M, Nelson C. Ropivacaine-induced seizure after extradural anaesthesia. Brit J Anaes. 1998;80(6):843-4.

Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G. Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Bio Med Aten Parm. 2008;79(2):92-105.

Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, Itoh M, Kawai K, Sakabe T. A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2003;97(2):512-9.

Gupta R, Bogra J, Verma R, Kohli M, Kushwaha JK, Kumar S. Dexmedetomidine as an intrathecal adjuvant for postoperative analgesia. Ind J Anaes. 2011;55(4):347.

Oztin C, Kirgiz E, Duman A, Kara I, Okesli S. The comparison of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine and isobaric ropivacaine-clonidine for caesarean delivery. Inter J Anesthesiol. 2006;15(1).

Bajwa SJ, Kulshrestha A. Dexmedetomidine: an adjuvant making large inroads into clinical practice. Ann Med Heal Sci Res. 2013;3(4):475-83.

Kujur S, Arora KK, Murthy MG, Ekka JP. A comparative study on effects of intrathecal ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine plus clonidine. Inter J Res Med Sci. 2017;3(6):1478-83.

Suthar O, Sethi P, Sharma UD. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine in lower limb surgery: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anaes Pain Intensive Care. 2019:147-52.

Chaudhary AK, Verma R, Bogra J, Singh PK, Chandra G, Bhatia VK. Low dose intrathecal clonidine enhances the effects of ropivacaine and improved the quality of recovery after ambulatory anorectal surgery. Ind J Clin Anaesth. 2015;2(3):151-5.

Parmar NK, Bhandari G, Shahi KS, Chand G, Rani D, Sharma G, et al. Effect of intrathecal ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine for operative and post-operative analgesia: a prospective randomized study. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2014;3(11):2917-25.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-27

How to Cite

Kallapur, B., H. S., Y., & Sheikh, S. I. (2019). A prospective randomised double-blind study of comparison of efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants to intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% in lower limb surgeries. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 7(3), 711–716. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20190538

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles