DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191336

Morphometric analysis of tibial plateau

Gyanaranjan Nayak, Sitansu K. Panda, Prafulla K. Chinara

Abstract


Background: Arthritis and injuries of the knee are frequently managed by knee arthroplasty. Knee prosthesis thus used needs population specific appropriate sizing. The aim of the study is to analyse tibial plateau morphometrically.

Methods: The study included 46 human tibia bones (28 left and 18 right). The anteroposterior length and transverse width of superior articular surface of both tibial condyles along with the anteroposterior length and transverse measurements of the intercondylar area were noted with digital Vernier caliper. The data was tabulated and analysed.

Results: For the superior articular surface of medial condyle, anteroposterior length was found to be 4.12±0.42cm on left side and 4.17±0.50cm on right side; maximum width was found to be 2.81±0.59cm on left side and 2.78±0.34cm on right side. For the superior surface of lateral condyle, the anteroposterior length was found to be 3.92±0.30cm on left side and 3.66±0.31cm on right side whereas maximum width was found to be 3.12±0.68cm on left side and 2.87±0.55cm on right side. Anteroposterior length of intercondylar area was measured to be 4.31±0.40cm on left side and 4.18±0.44cm on right side. The transverse measurement was recorded to be 3.12±0.68cm (left side), 2.87±0.55cm (right side) anteriorly; 1.25±0.23cm (left side), 1.31±0.20cm (right side) in the middle and 1.28±0.39cm (left side), 1.85±0.42cm (right side) posteriorly.

Conclusions: The results will be helpful in orthopaedic surgical procedures involving knee.


Keywords


Lateral condyle, Medial condyle, Prosthesis, Tibia, tibial plateau, Total knee replacement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Newell RLM. Pelvic girdle and lower limb. In: Standring S, Ellis H, Johnson D, Williams A. Gray’s Anatomy. 39th ed. Edinburgh, London, Churchill Livingstone; 2005:1399.

Ljunggren AE. The Tuberositas Tibiae and Extension in the knee joint. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1976;14:215-39.

Mark DG. Consistency and accuracy of measurement of lower limb amputee anthropometrics. JRRD. 2005;42:131-40.

Gandhi S, Singla RK, Kuller JS, Suri RK, Mehta V. Morphometric analysis of upper end of tibia. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8(8):AC 10-AC13.

Servien E, Saffarini M, Lusting S, Chomel S, Nevret P. Lateral versus medial tibial plateau. Morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design. J Knee Surg. 2008;16:1141-5.

Kwak DS, Surendran S, Pengalleeri YH, Park SE, Choi KN, Gopinathan P, et al. Morphometry of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty for Korean population. Knee. 2007;(14):295-300.

Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, Feng JC, Zheng WX, Sun YF, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee. 2009;(16):341-7.

Vasanthi A, Rao BN. Study of condylar parameters of tibiae an analysis pertaining to North Costal Andhra Pradesh population. IOSR. 2017;16(8):4-9.

Zanasi S. Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management. Eur Orthop Traumatol. 2011;2:21-31.

Zalawadia AZ, Patel SM. Morphometric study of upper end of tibia in Gujrat region and its clinical implication in knee arthroplasty. Int J Anat Res. 2018;6(1.1):4871-5.