DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192511

Utility of Chedoke arm hand activity inventory in the Indian population: mixed method research sequential explanatory

Hmingsangi Zaucha, Annie Thomas

Abstract


Background: One of the most common manifestations of stroke is hand function affectation. This can have a negative impact on daily, social and leisure activities. A formal evaluation protocol will be able to identify specific needs of a patient. The objective was to find out the stability of the Chedoke arm hand activity inventory in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients in India Method.

Methods: This was an observational study with sample size 29 and the sampling was convenience sampling. Participant criteria were sub-acute and chronic stroke patients, male and female, patients who follow commands, stable vitals, CMSA score of hand and leg function with stage 3, foot with stage 2, postural control with 6 or 7 and ability to walk 25 meters indoor. Recurrent stroke and hand dysfunction due to any reason other than stroke were excluded. Twenty-nine stroke patients, sub-acute and chronic where CMSA score taken prior to administration of CAHAI. A score of 1-7 for each task in CAHAI 13, total score of minimum 13 and maximum 91 with other considerations where “unsafe for the patient” was considered as score 1. Data analysis were done using SPSS version 22.0 and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results: A total of 29 participants included where the test retest reliability was r=0.98 with significance <0.001.

Conclusions: CAHAI found to be a highly reliable outcome measure.


Keywords


Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory, Epidemiology of stroke, Stroke, Outcome measures, Upper limb function

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Shaefer SY, Rebecca BL. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity following stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26(2):104-15.

Bennett D, Anderson LM, Nair N, Truelsen T, Barker-Collo S, Connor M, et al. Methodology of the global and regional burden of stroke study. Neuroepidemiol. 2012;38(1):30-40.

Kawle AP, Nayak AR, Lande NH, Kabra DP, Chandak NH, Badar SR, et al. Comparative evaluation of risk factors, outcome and biomarker levels in young and old acute ischemic stroke patients. Ann Neurosci. 2015;22(2):70-7.

Prasad K, Singhal KK. Stroke in young: an Indian perspective. 2010;58(3):343-50.

Pandian JD, Srikanth V, Read SJ, Thrift AG. Poverty and stroke in India: a time to act. Stroke. 2007 Nov 1;38(11):3063-9.

Rowland TJ, Turpin M, Gustafsson L, Henderson RD, Rend JS. Chadoke Arm Hand Activity Inventory-9 (CAHAI-9): perceived clinical utility within 14 days of stoke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):382-93.

Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, Hall J, McIlroy W, Cheung D, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010;41:1477-84.

Prigatano G. The importance of the patient’s subjective experience in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(1):30-4.

Prakash V, Patel SR, Hariohm K, Soni VS, Alagumoorthi G. Importance of squatting and sitting on the floor: perspectives and priorities of rural Indian patients with stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;1074-935.

Barreca S, Stratford PW, Lambert CL, Masters LM. Retest reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1616-22.

Harris JE, Eng JJ, Dawson WC. The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke Phys Ther. 2010;90(9):1302-10.

Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Hullenaar SV, Sanford J, et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):58-63.

Barreca S, Stardford P, Masters L. Comparing two versions of Chedoke arm hand activity inventory with the Action Research Arm Test. Physical Therapy. 2006;86(2):245-53.

Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(2).

Black RM. Cultural considerations of hand use. J Hand Ther. 2011;24:104-11.

Mehta SP, Mhatre BM, MacDermid JC, Mehta A. Cross-testing of the Hindi version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation cultural adaptation and psychometric. J Hand Ther. 2012;25:65-78.