DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192516

Effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasonography in assessing benign versus malignant nature of prostatomegaly

Saad Shareef, Anil Joshi

Abstract


Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is closely related with ageing. The present study was conducted to assess the ability of transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosing benign and/or malignant hypertrophy of the prostate.

Methods: An observational study was done in the Department of Radiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Sangli, Maharashtra, India of patients who had prostatomegaly on transabdominal ultrasound examination and underwent histopathological confirmation of the lesions from 1 October 2018 till 31 December 2018. The prostate gland was assessed for volume, echotexture, morphology, focal lesions and median lobe.

Results: Out of 155 patient’s benign prostatic disease was diagnosed in 116 patients, while malignancy was detected in the rest of the 39 cases. Prostate specific antigen levels were significantly higher among malignant cases (18.39±7.44 ng/ml) as compared to that of benign cases (7.51±3.22 ng/ml), p value <0.01. Benign lesions were predominantly inner glandular, while malignant cases were mainly peripheral. Moderate vascularity was found in 76.9% of the malignant cases. Focal vascular asymmetry was found in 74.4% of the malignant cases and only 12% of the benign cases. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosing malignant prostatic lesions was 94.8%, specificity was 75% with an overall accuracy of using transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of malignant prostatic lesions in this study population was 80%.

Conclusions: Transabdominal ultrasound evaluation of prostate is a simple, economical, non-invasive technique of choice due to its high accuracy in detecting size, nature of pathology as benign or malignant with fair accuracy.

Keywords


Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Prostate gland cancer, Prostate volume, Ultrasonography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kabala JE. The bladder and prostate: benign prostatic hyperplasia. Sutton D, eds. Textbook of Radiology and Imaging. 7th Ed. Elsevier Science Limited, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh; 2006: 1004-1005.

Applewhite JC, Matlaga BR, McCullough DL, Hall MC. Transrectal ultrasound and biopsy in the early diagnosis of 13. prostate cancer. Cancer Control. 2001;8(2):141-50.

Gunelli R, Fiori M, Bercovich E. Imaging of the prostate: traditional methods. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2002;74:177-81.

Kim SH, Kim SH. Correlations between the various methods of estimating prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(2):134-9.

Blanc M, Sacrini A, Avogadro A, Gattamorta M, Lazzerini F, Gattoni F, et al. Prostate volume: suprapubic versus transrectal ultrasono- graphy in the control of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Radiol Med. 1998;95(3):182-7.

Basawaraj N, Arul Dasan T. Can sonographic prostate volume predicts prostate specific antigen (psa) levels in blood among non prostatic carcinoma patients. Int J Biol Med Res. 2012;3:1895-8.

Ajayi I, Aremu A, Olajide A, Bello T, Olajide F, Adetiloye V. Correlation of transrectal and transabodominal ultrasound measurement of transition zone volume with post-operative enucleated adenoma volume in benign prostatic hypertrophy. Pan African Med J. 2013;16.

Malik R, Pandya VK, Naik D. Transrectal ultrasonography for evaluation of various benign and malignant prostatic lesions and their histopathological correlation. Ind J Radiol Imaging. 2004;14(2):155.

Rahmouni A, Yang A, Tempany CM, Frenkel T, Epstein J, Walsh P, et al. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography. J Comp Assisted Tomography. 1992;16(6):935-40.

Tewari A, Indudhara R, Shinohara K, Schalow E, Woods M, Lee R, et al. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Clin Ultrasound. 1996;24(4):169-74.

Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble contrast for radiological imaging, 2: applications. Ultrasound Q 2006;22:15-18.

Halpern EJ, Verkh L, Forsberg F, Gomella LG, Mattrey RF, Goldberg BB. Initial experience with contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1575-80.