DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20192909

Perception of dental practitioners in and around Kanpur city towards forensic odontology: a cross sectional study

Vishal Mehrotra, Gauri Mishra, Rohan Sachdev, Kriti Garg, Sekhar Mukherjee, Shubhra Saxena

Abstract


Background: In the present era, forensic odontology has expanded as one of the most remarkable and commendable branches of Forensic Sciences. Through forensic odontology, a dentist plays a very important role in crime investigation of any type. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge, percipience and practical perception of forensic odontology among the dental practitioners in and around Kanpur city.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from Jan-Mar 2019 among 207 dental practitioners in and around Kanpur city including 143 BDS and 64 MDS through a questionnaire proforma. The proforma consisted of 20 questions prepared on the topic of forensic Odontology and role of dentist in the field of forensic Odontology.

Results: In this study, nearly 70% of dental practitioners were aware of the role of dentist in forensics, and around 60% of dental practitioners maintain dental records with recording of personal data and clinical findings being the most frequently used method. In the present study most of the dental practitioners were not aware of significance of chelioscopy (63%) and rugoscopy (66%) in field of forensic Odontology. Nearly 70% of dentist accepted the fact that their level of knowledge regarding forensic dentistry is inadequate and nearly 40% of them were not confident in giving any opinion regarding the same.

Conclusions: This study shows that although there is an adequate awareness of role of dentist in forensic Odontology, but there is lack of good knowledge, confidence and practical approach of the dental practitioners towards forensic Odontology which may be due to lack of training, experience, exposure in field of forensics. Thus, the need of the hour lies in updating the knowledge and also developing interest of the dental practitioners regarding forensic Odontology.


Keywords


Dentist, Forensic odontology, Knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sahni A, Rehani S, Mathias Y, Kardam P, Nagpal R, Kumari R. A questionnaire survey on forensic odontology: Are we really aware?. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(2):113.

Nielsen KS. Forensic odontology. Int Dent J. 1968; 18:668-83.

Shamim T, Varughese VI, Shameena PM, Sudha S. Forensic odontology: a new perspective. Medicoleg Update. 2006;6:1‑4.

Presecki Z, Brkic H, Primorac D, Drmic I. Methods of preparing the tooth from DNA isolation. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000;34(1):15-20.

Bhakhri S, Kaur A, Singh K, Puri MS, Anandani C, Puri N. Perception of forensic odontology and its practice among the local dentists of an institution. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2017;5(7):53.

Shanbhag VK. Significance of dental records in personal identification in forensic sciences. J Forens Sci Med. 2016;2(1):39.

Pretty IA, Sweet D. forensic dentistry: a look at forensic dentistry-Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Brit Dent J. 2001;190(7):359.

Prasad S, Sujatha G, Sivakumar G, Muruganandhan J. Forensic Dentistry: what a dentist should know. Ind J Multidiscip Dent. 2012;2:443-7.

Preethi S, Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B. Awareness of forensic odontology among dental practitioners in Chennai: a knowledge, attitude, practice study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(2):63.

Harchandani N, Marathe S, Hebbale M, Ul Nisa S, Hiremutt D. Awareness of forensic odontology among general dental practitioners in pune-a cross-sectional study. J Adv Med Dent Sci Res. 2014;2(3):10-6.

Navya N, Raj JD. To assess the knowledge and attitude toward forensic odontology among dentists in Chennai city. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2016;1(1):17-20.

Rao DS, Ali IM, Annigeri RG. Bitemarks-a review. J Dent Res Rev. 2016;3(1):31.

Daniel MJ, Pazhani A. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: a comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(3):222-6.

Adebisi SS. Forensic anthropology in perspective: the current trend. Internet J Forensic Sci. 2009;4(1).

Thomas CJ, Van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1988;6: 21-7.

Sultana Q, Shariff MH, Asif M, Avadhani R. Cheiloscopy: a scientific approach for personal identification. Int J Anat Res. 2014;2(4):668-72.

Nagarajappa R, Aapaliya P, Sharda AJ, Asawa K, Tak M, Pujara P, et al. Teledentistry: knowledge and attitudes among dentists in Udaipur, India. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013;12(502):2.