DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20193931

Comparison between the results of proximal femur nail anti-rotation and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in Sanglah Hospital in 2016

Wayan Suryanto Dusak, Herryanto Agustriadi Simanjuntak, I Gusti Ngurah Paramartha Wijaya Putra

Abstract


Background: Hemiarthroplasty is now being considered as a primary treatment for comminuted unstable type of IT fracture in elderly on the grounds that it allows early mobilization and full weight bearing. Recently popular modality is fourth generation of intramedullary nails like the Proximal Femoral Nails. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure.

Methods: A Forty patients, having Intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA or cemented BH at our institution between April 2016 and April 2017. The primary outcomes measures were postoperative complication and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, postoperative haemoglobin and hospital stay.

Results: Seventeen patients in PFNA group and 23 patients in BH group were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two group regarding to the Harris Hip Score at 6 months follow up. Significant differences were found between PFNA and BH group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.006), surgical time (p < 0.001), postoperative transfusion (p < 0.001), and decrease of hemoglobin (p=0.001).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that PFNA has obvious advantages over the BH in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in case of surgical trauma and postoperative complication.


Keywords


Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, Intertrochanteric Fracture, Proximal Femur Nail Anti-Rotation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbellā€™s operative orthopaedics. 11[1]th Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier; 2008.

Saha PK. Comparative Analysis of Results of Primary Bipolar Arthroplasty versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: A Prospective Study. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4(3):50-5.

Maru N, Sayani K. Unstable intertrochanteric fractures in high risk elderly patients treated with primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty: retrospective case series. Gujarat Med J. 2013;68(2):68-72.

Xu Y, Geng D, Mao H, Zhu X, Yang H. A comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation device and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fracture. J Int Med Res. 2010;38:1266-75.

Swaroop Das D, Kalambe HV, Handralmath SP. Comparative study of unstable intertrochanteric fracture treatment by trochanteric femoral nail versus hip hemiarthroplasty. Int J Orthop. 2017;3(4):548-52.

Mansukhani SA, Tuteja AV, Kasodekar VB, Mukhi SR. A Comparative study of the Dynamic Hip Screw, the Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and the Proximal Femoral Nail for the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(4):RC14-9.

Suh Y-S, Nho J-H, Kim S-M, Hong S, Choi H-S, Park J-S. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes among Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty, Compression Hip Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation in Treating Comminuted Intertrochanteric Fractures. Hip Pelvis. 2015;27(1):30.

Luo X, He S, Zeng D, Lin L, Li Q. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures: Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;38:37-42.

Chang Q, Liu S, Guan C, Yu F, Wu S, Jiang C. Bipolar hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1455-9.

Harrington P, Nihal A, Singhania AK, Howell FR. Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. Injury. 2002;33(1):23-8.

Dhamangaonkar AC. Management Options and Treatment Algorithm in Intertrochanteric Fractures. Trauma Int. 2015;1(1):12-6.