DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20200219

A study of femoral bicondylar angle in Udaipur, India zone

Bhavana Shrivastava, Rupali Mehta, Prabhakaran K., L. K. Jain

Abstract


Background: Human body consists of 206 bones; among which femur. The thigh bone is considered as the biggest and strongest bone of the body. The bone contains a femoral bicondylar angle which helps in maintaining the balance and certain movements of the body. Those movements are essential to stand upright and erect; therefore, helps in balancing the posture of the body. Bicondylar angle shows various gestures and characteristics essential for describing the necessary ailments of the human skeleton. Thus, the present study is designed with an aim to measure and compare the bicondylar angle of femur both in males and females in Udaipur, Rajasthan, India zone.

Methods: Totally, 96 bones were studied- 48 males and 48 females’ bones in 2 years duration. The study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy of Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital and R.N.T. Medical College. The bicondylar angle was measured with a suitable apparatus comprising of compass, Digital Vernier Calliper, scale and protector (Figure 1) along with osteometric board. Bicondylar angle of male and female bone was calculated using SPSS software.

Results: The study shows that the bicondylar angle of left femur was greater than right femur in both the genders, but their side differences was statistically insignificant (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Hence, the bicondylar angle of female is larger than in comparison to males and these results can put emphasis/light on the orthopaedic clinicians and surgeons to know the etiology of osteometric diseases.


Keywords


Bicondylar angle, Bone, Femoral bicondylar angle, Femur, Genders

Full Text:

PDF

References


Standring S. Gray`s Anatomy- The anatomical basis of clinical practice; In pelvic girdle, gluteal region and hip joint. 39` Edition, Elsevier Churchill

Livingstone London; 2004:1316-1337.

Enock Prabhakar P. In: Practical Medico-Legal Manual, a publication of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine; 1988:447-459.

Igbigbi P.S., Sharrif M. The bicondylar angle of adult Malawians. Am J Orthop. 2005;34(6):291-94.

King CA, Iscan MY, Loth SR. Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(5):954-58.

Chandrasekaran S, Shastri D. Bicondylar angle of femur in south Indian population-an analytical study. Nat J Bas Med Sci. 2011;1:124-8.

Javois C, Tardieu C, Lebel B, Seil R, Hulet C; Société française d'arthroscopie. Comparative Anatomy of the Knee Join: Effects on the Lateral Meniscus. Orthopedics Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(8Suppl 1):S49-59.

Leakey MG., Feibel CS., McDougall I., Ward, C., and Walker, A. New specimens and confirmation of an early age for Australopithecus anamensis. Nature. 1998;393 62-6.

Cowgill LW, Warrener A, Pontzer H, Ocobock C. Waddling and toddling: the biomechanical effects of an immature gait. Am J Phys Anthropo. 2010;143(1):52-61.

Tardieu C., Trinkaus E. Early ontogeny of the human femur. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1995;95(2):183-95.

Shefelbine S.J., Tardieu C., Carter DR. Development of the femoral bicondylar angle in hominid bipedalism. Bone. 2002;30(5);765-70.

Pandya AM, Singel TC, Patel MM, Gohil DV. A study of the femoral bicondylar angle in the Gujarat region. J Anatomical Soc India. 2008;57(2):131-34.

Jyothi Lakshmi GL, Afroze MKH, Yogesh C, Pai V, Lakshmiprabha S. Bicondylar angle of femur: an anthropometric study in south Indian population. Res J Pharmaceutical, Bio Chemical Sci. 2015;6(4):1952-9.

Sharma RL, Sharma SK, Jehan M, Sastya A. Sexual dimorphism of the femoral bicondylar angle in Gwalior, Int J Healthcare Biol Res. 2014;2(4):38-45.

U Ukoha, C. Oranusi, O. Uzozie, J. Okafor, P. Ogugua, A. Metu. Radiological assessment of the femoral bicondylar angle in a Nigerian Population. 2011;15(2).

McMinn R.M.H. Last's Anatomy regional and Thapplied etal. in Osteology of the lower limb. 9` Ed, Churchill Livingstone London; 1994:221-224.