Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair: a case report

Authors

  • I. G. N. Wien Aryana Consultant, Sanglah General Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, University of Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
  • Rizki Zainuraditya Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Sanglah General Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, University of Udayana, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20201952

Keywords:

Arthroscopic bankart repair, Letarjet procedure, Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation

Abstract

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) provides acceptable results for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. However, recent studies have shown recurrent rates of 4-19% or even up to 35-40% in patients aged <25 years, and the results tend to get worse after long-term follow-up. The Latarjet procedure can improve anterior stability by multiple mechanisms, not only can the Bankart lesion be repaired and provide stability, but the transfer of the coracoid process extends the bony articular arc of the glenoid, and the addition of the conjoint tendon may provide dynamic stability as well. The Latarjet procedure for correcting recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation led to good and excellent results in 82.7% of the cases. The Latarjet procedure had the lowest re-dislocation rate, which was significantly lower than the arthroscopic Bankart repair. Latarjet procedure is effective in terms of restoring anteroinferior glenohumeral stability and good option for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. Recurrence rates of instability are acceptable and re-operation rates were low.

References

Prinja A, Raymond A, Pimple M. A Biomechanical Comparison of Two Techniques of Latarjet Procedure in Cadaveric Shoulders. Advan Orthoped. 2020;2020.

Dupley L, Funk L. The Latarjet Procedure: Effective and Safe. Open Orthopaed J. 2019 Dec 31;13(1):272-5.

Shibata H, Gotoh M, Mitsui Y, Kai Y, Nakamura H, Kanazawa T, Okawa T, Higuchi F, Shirahama M, Shiba N. Risk factors for shoulder re-dislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Orthopaed Surg Res. 2014 Dec;9(1):53.

Flinkkilä T, Sirniö K. Open Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. Orthopaed Traumatol: Surg Res. 2015 Feb 1;101(1):35-8.

Ho AG, Gowda AL, Wiater JM. Evaluation and treatment of failed shoulder instability procedures. Journal of Orthopaed Traumatol. 2016 Sep 1;17(3):187-97.

Mercier N, Saragaglia D. Mini-open latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Adv Orthoped. 2011 Dec 5;2011.

Sisto DJ. Revision of failed arthroscopic Bankart repairs. Am J Sports Medi. 2007 Apr;35(4):537-41.

De Giorgi S, Garofalo R, Tafuri S, Cesari E, Delle Rose G, Castagna A. Can arthroscopic revision surgery for shoulder instability be a fair option?. Muscles, Ligam Tend J. 2014 Apr;4(2):226.

Sofu H, Gürsu S, Koçkara N, Öner A, Issın A, Çamurcu Y. Recurrent anterior shoulder instability: review of the literature and current concepts. World Journal of Clinical Cases: WJCC. 2014 Nov 16;2(11):676.

Kleiner MT, Payne WB, McGarry MH, Tibone JE, Lee TQ. Biomechanical comparison of the Latarjet procedure with and without capsular repair. Clini Orthoped Surg. 2016 Mar 1;8(1):84-91.

Boileau P, Thélu CÉ, Mercier N, Ohl X, Houghton-Clemmey R, et al. Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Combined with Bankart Repair Restores Shoulder Instability in Patients With Glenoid Bone Loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;427:2413-2424.

Gupta A, Delaney R, Petkin K, Lafosse L. Complications of the Latarjet procedure. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015; 8: 59-66.

Colegate-Stone TJ, van der Watt C, de Beer JF. Evaluation of functional outcomes and complications following modified Latarjet reconstruction in athletes with anterior shoulder instability. Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Jul;7(3):168-73.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-27

How to Cite

Aryana, I. G. N. W., & Zainuraditya, R. (2020). Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair: a case report. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 8(5), 1921–1923. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20201952

Issue

Section

Case Reports