DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20202518

Significant perceived stressors in irritable bowel syndrome: a stress interventional module analysed

Sanjay Gupta, Nitesh Kumar Singh, Vinod Verma

Abstract


Background: Psychological stress is an important factor for the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). More and more clinical and experimental evidences are showing that IBS is a combination of irritable bowel and irritable brain. As IBS is a stress sensitive disorder, its treatment should focus on managing stress and stress-induced responses.

Methods: This is a hospital based longitudinal study. 72 patients fulfilling the Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome were enrolled into the study. Perceived stress was assessed using student stress dimension questionnaire (SSDQ) while IBS severity was assessed using IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS). The stress interventional module (SIM) consist of specific domain targeted psychological interventions given to the patients weekly based on the stress domain mapping. The effectiveness of these interventions on reducing stress as well as IBS severity was assessed at baseline, and weeks 2, 4 and 6 follow-ups.

Results: Of the studied IBS patients, most had SPS in multiple life domains while familial and interpersonal domains were affected in 78%. Also, total stress load in form of mean cumulative stress load at baseline was 451.1 which decreased significantly to 274.4 over 6 weeks. This SIM brought about a reduction in mean irritable bowel syndrome severity score from 27.5 to 20.6 in 6 weeks. This reduction in IBS severity score overtime was significant (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Patients of irritable bowel syndrome show significant stress in multiple domains of life, which require proper assessment and management. Authors propose that individual-specific interventions aimed at reducing stress in all psychosocial life domains are efficacious and should be an integral part of managing IBS.


Keywords


Cumulative stress load, Irritable bowel syndrome, Psychological stress, Student stress dimension questionnaire

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rahman MM, Mahadeva S, Ghoshal UC. Epidemiological and clinical perspectives on irritable bowel syndrome in India, Bangladesh and Malaysia: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(37):6788-801.

Musial F, Häuser W, Langhorst J, Dobos G, Enck P. Psychophysiology of visceral pain in IBS and health. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:589-97.

Larauche M, Mulak A, Taché Y. Stress-related alterations of visceral sensation: animal models for irritable bowel syndrome study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17(3):213-34.

Karantanos T, Markoutsaki T, Gazouli M, Anagnou NP, Karamanolis DG. Current insights in to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2010;2:3.

Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Stress and the gut: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;62:591-9.

Surdea-Blaga T, Băban A, Dumitrascu DL. Psychosocial determinants of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:616-26.

Banerjee A, Sarkhel S, Sarkar R, Dhali GK. Anxiety and depression in irritable bowel syndrome. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017;39:741-5.

Kabra N, Nadkarni A. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in irritable bowel syndrome - a clinic based study from India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55:77-80.

Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer; New York: 1984. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5bef/cc8f5b1f19b3e8411d1f00add4c49e42f87e.pdf. Accessed on 25th March 2020.

Lacy BE, Patel NK. Rome criteria and a diagnostic approach to irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Med. 2017;6(11):99.

Drossman DA, Chang L, Bellamy N, Gallo-Torres HE, Lembo A, Mearin F, et al. Severity in irritable bowel syndrome: a rome foundation working team report. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(10):1749-59.

Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych.1960;23(1):56.

Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32:50-5.

Gupta S. Development and validation of students stress dimension questionnaire (SSDQ). Indian J Applied Res. 2016;6(7):90-6.

Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring Irritable Bowel Syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11:395-402.

Gupta S, Singh NK, Verma V. Management of dissociative disorders: the stress loading hypothesis and utility of students stress dimension questionnaire (SSDQ). Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9(7):1-11.

Silvernale C, Kuo B, Staller K. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with an increased prevalence of co morbid anxiety and depression among patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: results from a multicenter cohort. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(9):1070-4.

Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;11:213-8.

Lovell RM, Ford AC. Effect of gender on prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:991-1000.

Gwee KA, Lu CL, Ghoshal UC. Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in Asia: something old, something new something borrowed. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1601-7.

Chang L. The role of stress on physiologic responses and clinical symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol. 2011;140:761-5.

Whitehead WE, Crowell MD, Robinson JC, Heller BR, Schuster MM. Effects of stressful life events on bowel symptoms: subjects with irritable bowel syndrome compared with subjects without bowel dysfunction. Gut. 1992;33:825-30.

Koolhaas JM, Bartolomucci A, Buwalda B, de Boer SF, Flugge G, Korte SM, et al. Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(5):1291-301.

Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(3):243-51.

Lucassen PJ, Pruessner J, Sousa N, Almeida OF, Van Dam AM, Rajkowska G, et al. Neuropathology of stress. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(1):109-35.