DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20203685

Comparison between imprint cytology and frozen sections in intraoperative consultation of ovarian tumours

Reily Ann Ivan, Kuruvilla P. Chacko, Pramod Thomas

Abstract


Background: The ovaries frequently are the site for various primary tumors. Correct intraoperative diagnosis is crucial. The application of imprint cytology is very useful where frozen section facility is not available. The present study is a comparison of imprint cytology and frozen section during intraoperative consultation for various types of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms in different age groups.

Methods: Seventy-six cases of ovarian tumors were examined using both imprint cytology and frozen section and evaluated, taking histopathological report as gold standard. The histopathological diagnoses consisted of benign (54), borderline (9), and malignant (13). The malignant tumors consisted of various types including serous carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma and carcinoid.

Results: All 54 benign cases were accurately diagnosed as benign by imprint cytology. With frozen section 53 cases were correctly diagnosed as benign but one case was over diagnosed as borderline. Among 13 malignant cases 11 (84.6%) were correctly diagnosed with both techniques. Borderline tumors were not able to be diagnosed with imprint smear, 3 out of 9 cases were correctly diagnosed with frozen section.

Conclusion: When compared with frozen section, imprint cytology is a simple, inexpensive and useful diagnostic tool in intraoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Imprint smear is not useful in borderline tumors where only frozen section is useful. Imprint cytology can be used as an adjunct to frozen section for better diagnosis.


Keywords


Imprint cytology, Frozen section, Intraoperative consultation, Ovarian tumours

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker P, Oliva EA. practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27(3):353-65.

Souka S, Kamel M, Rocca M, El‐Assi M, Hebeishy N, Sheir SH. The combined use of cytological imprint and frozen section in the intraoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1990;31(1):43-6.

Alvarez Santín C, Sica A, Melesi S, Feijó A, Garrido G, Rodríguez Alvarez C. Contribution of intraoperative cytology to the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(1):85-91.

RJ K, ML C, CS H, RH Y. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs [Internet]. Available from: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Classification-Of-Tumours/WHO-Classification-Of-Tumours-Of-Female-Reproductive-Organs-2014. Last accessed on 16 August 2020.

Nagai Y, Tanaka N, Horiuchi F, Ohki S, Seki K, Sekiya S. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative imprint cytology in ovarian epithelial tumors. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;72(2):159-64.

Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S. Scrape cytology of the ovaries: potential role in intraoperative consultation of ovarian lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;28(5):250-7.

Azami S, Aoki Y, Iino M, Sakaguchi A, Ogura K, Ogishima D et al. Useful aspects of diagnosis of imprint cytology in intraoperative consultation of ovarian tumors: comparison between imprint cytology and frozen sections. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46(1):28-34.

Kushima M. Problems in the Pathological Diagnosis and Intraoperative Rapid Diagnosis of Mucinous Tumor of the Ovary. Showa Univ J Med Sci. 2013;25(1):1-7.

Intraoperative consultation in ovarian lesions: A comparison between cytology and frozen section - Michael - 1996 - Diagnostic Cytopathology - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199612)15:5%3C387::AID-DC6%3E3.0.CO;2-9. Accessed on 14 August 2020.