Use of rescue high frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates with acute respiratory failure after failing conventional ventilation

Authors

  • Ali Kumble Department of Neonatology, Indiana Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Abhishek K. Phadke Department of Neonatology, Indiana Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Shakib Shafi Department of Neonatology, Indiana Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20211875

Keywords:

HFOV, High frequency oscillation, Neonates, Respiratory failure, Ventilation

Abstract

Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is a newer mode of ventilation in neonates. The objective of this study was to study the efficacy of rescue HFOV in improving the oxygenation and ventilation in neonates with acute respiratory failure after failing synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV).

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 12 months. Neonates with respiratory distress requiring ventilation on SIMV mode based upon the unit protocol were included in the study. Babies who have failed on SIMV were then switched over to HFOV. The primary outcome measures were oxygenation index (OI), ventilation: alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO2) and duration of ventilation with a secondary outcome measure of mortality and complications associated with ventilation.

Results: A total of 65 babies were ventilated out of which 11 babies required high frequency oscillatory ventilation as per the study protocol. Of 11 neonates who were oscillated eight (72.7%) improved and survived. Among the babies who survived OI<13 was seen in a total of six babies in the first three hours of oscillation and OI<10 was seen in two babies. There was no statistically significance difference in the incidence of intra-ventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and pneumothorax between HFOV and SIMV group.

Conclusions: High frequency oscillatory ventilation was found to improve short term oxygenation and ventilation in neonates who failed SIMV. HFOV is not associated with increased risk of pneumothorax or IVH.

References

Lia Graciano A, Freid EB. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants and children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15(2):161-6.

Bunnell JB. High-frequency ventilation: general concepts. In: Donn SM, Sinha SK, editors. Neonatal Respiratory Care. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Mosby, Inc.; 2006:222-230.

Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3).CD000104.

Cools F, Askie LM, Offringa M, Asselin JM, Calvert SA, Courtney SE, et al. Elective high-frequency oscillatory versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patients’ data. Lancet. 2010;375(9731):2082-91.

Chen DM, Wu LQ, Wang RQ. Efficiency of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with pulmonary surfactant in the treatment of neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):14490-6.

Singh SN, Malik GK, Prashanth GP, Singh A, Kumar M. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm neonates with hyaline membrane disease: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(5):405-8.

Gupta P, Green JW, Tang X, Gall CM, Gossett JM, Rice TB, et al. Comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:243-9.

Batra D, Schoonakker B, Smith C. Mechanical ventilation in neonates. Nottingham Neonatal Service- Clinical Guidelines 1-26 (May 2017). Available at: https://www.academia.edu/35358507/Nottingham_Neonatal_Service_Clinical_Guidelines_Guideline_B1_Mechanical_Ventilation_in_Neonates_B1. Accessed on 2 July 2020.

Sun H, Cheng R, Kang W, Xiong H, Zhou C, Zhang Y, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support in preterm infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care. 2014;59(2):159-69.

Durand DJ, Asselin JM, Courtney SE, Weber KR, Meredith KS, Helem JF, et al. Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 1993;122:609-19.

Gerstmann DR, Minton SD, Stoddard RA, Meredith KS, Monaco F, Bertrand JF, et al. The Provo multicenter early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation trial: improved pulmonary and clinical outcome in respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics. 1996;98(6 pt 1):1044-57.

Jaballah NB, Mnif K, Khaldi A, Bouziri A, Belhadj S, Hamdi A. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in term and near-term infants with acute respiratory failure: early rescue use. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23(7):403-11.

Sarnaik AP, Meert KL, Pappas MD, Simpson PM, Lieh-Lai MW, Heidemann SM. Predicting outcome in children with severe acute respiratory failure treated with high-frequency ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(8):1396-402.

Jaballah NB, Khaldi A, Mnif K, Bouziri A, Belhadj S, Hamdi A, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in pediatric patients with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(4):362-7.

Cools F, Henderson-Smart DJ, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD000104.

Poddutoor PK, Chirla DK, Sachane K, Shaik FA, Venkatlakshmi A. Rescue high frequency oscillation in neonates with acute respiratory failure. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:467-70.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-28

How to Cite

Kumble, A., Phadke, A. K., & Shafi, S. (2021). Use of rescue high frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates with acute respiratory failure after failing conventional ventilation. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 9(5), 1398–1402. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20211875

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles