DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20211358

Study on ocular anomalies in pediatric patients with special reference to congenital anomalies

Leena Paul, Jawahar Jyoti Kuli

Abstract


Background: Aim of the study was to study the proportion, clinical and etiological profile of congenital ocular anomalies in pediatric patients and limit its magnitude wherever possible so that preventable blindness can be dealt effectively.

Methods: Present study was carried out in AMCH, Dibrugarh during the period of July 2018-June 2019. Total 1850 pediatric cases were examined, VA testing was done by Snellen’s chart or clinical judgment by HM, PL and PR also with Allen pictures in preschool children and in infants’ pupillary response and OKN were done. Examination under general anesthesia was done when necessary for posterior segment evaluation and IOP estimation.

Results: Proportion congenital ocular anomalies were found to be 13.72%. Male:female ratio was found to be 1.8:1 where majority of cases were within 4 years of age. Most common congenital anomaly was congenital cataract followed by uveal coloboma, microphthalmos and anophthalmos etc. Majority of congenital cataract were in first birth rank and in 4.33% cases parents gave history of consanguinity.

Conclusions: The prevalence of congenital anomaly varies in different aspects like age, sex, dwelling, socioeconomic class etc., factors like maternal infection, medication during pregnancy and maternal nutrition may have influence on production of congenital anomalies. Treatable congenital anomaly like congenital cataract, congenital glaucoma, eyelid coloboma etc. should be managed by ophthalmologist. Various demographic and mainly maternal factors which are found in study give a clue for further study on those group of people to get a conclusion for the etiology of ocular congenital anomalies concerned.

 


Keywords


Ocular malformation, Birth defect, Congenital anomaly, Chromosomal malformation, Cataract, Coloboma, Microphthalmos, Iris coloboma, Optic nerve hypoplasia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gilbert C, Rahi JS, Quinn GE. Visual impairment and blindness in children. In: Johnson GJ, eds. The epidemiology of eye disease, 2nd ed. London, Arnold Publishers. 2003;260-86.

Dolk H, Doyle P, Garne E. A Review of Environmental Risk Factors for Congenital Anomalies edition. Eurocat. 2004;7-30.

Chuka-Okosa CM, Magulike NO, Onyekonwu GC. Congenital eye anomalies in Enugu, South-Eastern Nigeria. West Afri J Med. 2005;24:112-24.

Hossein MA, Kargar Maher MH, Afsharnia F, Dastgiri S. Prevalence of congenital anomalies: a community-based study in the Northwest of Iran. ISRN pediatrics. 2014;2014.

Zīle I, Villeruša A. Maternal age-associated congenital anomalies among newborns: a retrospective study in Latvia. Medicina. 2013;49(1):6.

Tomairek RH, Amin MM, Raafat K, Abdel Hady S, Elkotoury A. Prevalence of Congenital Ocular Anomalies among Children with Genetic Disorders: An Egyptian Study. In Seminars in ophthalmol. 2018;33(5):613-9).

Ilechie AA, Essuman VA, Enyionam S. Prevalence of congenital eye anomalies in a paediatric clinic in Ghana. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 2013;19(2):1-7.

Dutta LC, Bhattacharjee H. Influence of birth rank and parental age on congenital and colobomatous defects. Indian j ophthalmol. 1984;32(2):81.

Bromiker R, Glam-Baruch M, Gofin R, Hammerman C, Amitai Y. Association of parental consanguinity with congenital malformations among Arab newborns in Jerusalem. Clin Genet. 2004;66(1):63-6.

Tupe PN, Chaudhari SV. A study on prevalence of congenital ocular anomalies in paediatric age group. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2015;4(4):884-8.

Chuang CH, Doyle P, Wang JD, Chang PJ, Lai JN, Chen PC. Herbal medicines used during the first trimester and major congenital malformations. Drug safety. 2006 ;29(6):537-48.

Wirth MG, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, Elder JE, Mackey DA. Aetiology of congenital and paediatric cataract in an Australian population. Bri J ophthalmol. 2002;86(7):782-6.

Maumenee I, Mitchell T. Colobomatous malformations of the eye. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:123-32.