DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20212528

Gender inequality in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos on YouTube

Reeya N. Gulve, Anuradha R. Joshi

Abstract


Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is performed at a significantly lower rate in women than in men. YouTube has a significant role in influencing the public’s perceptions about CPR due to its popularity. The aim of the study was to compare the availability, quality, and scientific accuracy of YouTube videos demonstrating hands-only CPR performed on men and woman recipient.

Methods: Using three search terms similar to hands-only CPR, YouTube was searched for videos in English. This study included the first 60 videos for each search term. All the videos meeting the inclusion criteria were viewed and classified according to gender of recipient of CPR. Views per day were calculated. Videos were scored for quality and scientific accuracy, using Global Quality Scale (GQS) score and comprehensiveness analysis respectively. Mean, standard deviation was calculated for all the variables. Independent t-tests were done to compare the mean values. A p value<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Only 12 (1.7%) videos demonstrated hands-only CPR performed on women as compared to 43 videos (6%) demonstrated in men. There was a statistically significant difference in GQS score, whereas, there was no statistically significant difference in viewer rate and comprehensiveness analysis score based upon the gender of recipient of CPR.

Conclusions: The availability and quality of YouTube videos demonstrating hands-only CPR performed on men and women recipients differ significantly. There are limited numbers of videos available for demonstrations of CPR performed on women, and the majority of them are of poor quality and lack scientific accuracy.


Keywords


Gender, Hands-only CPR, Inequality, Women, YouTube

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1479-87.

Geri G, Fahrenbruch C, Meischke H, Painter I, White L, Rea TD, et al. Effects of bystander CPR following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on hospital costs and long-term survival. Resuscitation. 2017;115:129-34.

Iwami T, Nichol G, Hiraide A, Hayashi Y, Nishiuchi T, Kajino K, et al. Continuous improvements in "chain of survival" increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A large-scale population-based study. Circulation. 2009;119:728-34.

Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, et al. Resuscitation outcomes consortium investigators. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. JAMA. 2008;300:1423-31. Erratum in: JAMA. 200;300:1763.

Hollenberg J, Herlitz J, Lindqvist J, Riva G, Bohm K, Rosenqvist M, et al. Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew-witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2008;118:389-96.

Berg RA, Hemphill R, Abella BS, Aufderheide TP, Cave DM, Hazinski MF, et al. Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122(18):S685-705.

Cummins RO, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE. Survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 1985;3:114-9.

Urban J, Thode H, Stapleton E, Singer AJ. Current knowledge of and willingness to perform hands-Only CPR in laypersons. Resuscitation. 2013;84:1574-8.

Sasson C, Haukoos JS, Bond C, Rabe M, Colbert SH, King R, et al. Barriers and facilitators to learning and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in neighborhoods with low bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation prevalence and high rates of cardiac arrest in Columbus. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:550-8.

Sasson C, Haukoos JS, Youssef BL, Ramirez L, Bull S, Eigel B, et al. Barriers to calling 911 and learning and performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for residents of primarily Latino, high-risk neighborhoods in Denver, Colorado. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;65:545-52.

Schmid KM, Millman NK, Hammes A, Kroehl M, García RQ, McDermott MU, et al. Barriers and facilitators to community CPR education in San José, Costa Rica. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31:509-15.

Ahn KO, Shin SD, Hwang SS. Sex disparity in resuscitation efforts and outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1810-6.

Safdar B, Stolz U, Stiell IG, Cone DC, Bobrow BJ, deBoehr M, et al. Differential survival for men and women from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest varies by age: Results from the OPALS study. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:1503-11.

Blewer AL, McGovern SK, Schmicker RH, May S, Morrison LJ, Aufderheide TP, et al. Resuscitation outcomes consortium (ROC) investigators. Gender disparities among Adult recipients of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the public. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11:e004710.

Karlsson V, Dankiewicz J, Nielsen N, Kern KB, Mooney MR, Riker RR, et al. Association of gender to outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest- a report from the International Cardiac Arrest Registry. Crit Care. 2015;19:182.

American Heart Association. Go red for women. Available at https:// www. Gored forwomen. org/en/about-heart-disease-in-women/facts/cpr-and-women. Accessed on 25 April 2021.

Youtube.com. Press. Available at https://www.youtube.com/intl/en-GB/about/press/. Accessed on 25 April 2021.

Tourinho FS, Medeiros KS, Salvador PT, Castro GL, Santos VE. Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012;39:335-9.

Katipoğlu B, Akbaş İ, Koçak AO, Erbay MF, Turan Eİ, Kasali K. Assessment of the accuracy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA resuscitation guidelines. Emerg Med Int. 2019;2019:1272897.

Ferhatoglu YS, Kudsioglu T. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Australas Emerg Care. 2020;23:211-6.

Lynes CW, Toft LEB. Availability and quality of Internet-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training films featuring women experiencing cardiac arrest. JAMA. Cardiol. 2020;5:1448-9.

Prospect Search Engine User Behaviour Study. Available at district 4. extension. ifas. ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf. Accessed on 25 April 2021.

Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2070-7.

American Heart Association. Available at https://www.heart.org. Accessed on 25 April 202.

Park HJ, Jeong WJ, Moon HJ, Kim GW, Cho JS, Lee KM, et al. Factors associated with high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by bystander. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:8356201.

Jarman AF, Mumma BE, Perman SM, Shah KP, McGregor AJ. When the female heart stops: Sex and gender differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology and resuscitation. Clin Ther. 2019;41:1013-9.

Perman SM, Shelton SK, Knoepke C, Rappaport K, Matlock DD, Adelgais K, et al. Public perceptions on why women receive less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation than men in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2019;139:1060-8.

Madathil KC, Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21:173-94.

Harris J, Atkinson A, Mink M, Porcellato L. Young people's experiences and perceptions of YouTuber-produced health content: Implications for health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2021;48:199-207.